this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
235 points (99.2% liked)

Open Source

33679 readers
488 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thought this was interesting and worth knowing about

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 25 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Who is the moron at Mozilla that thought it would be a good idea to sell user information, and how much does he make a year?

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 24 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

$6M, but if you look at the California law that spurred this change, the Privacy Policy that hasn't changed since July 2024, and the revised ToS, this looks mostly like a really, really, really stupid communication error.

It's one of those cases where legally, "sell" includes things that most people wouldn't consider a sale in normal parlance, but Mozilla has to comply with the overbroad legal definition; meanwhile, they don't appear to be fundamentally changing anything about how they're operating.

ETA: I'm still moving to LibreWolf (and maybe Ladybird later on). I'm not a lawyer, and expecting people like me to parse legal definitions of commonly understood words is just asinine.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Ladybird is interesting, but not ready to be a daily driver yet.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Alpha release is expected in 2026, it isn't trying to be ready yet, and I love that.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'd rather have something fully cooked than half-baked.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

You're missing the point:

It isn't supposed to be ready, of course you'd rather have something ready. Ladybird is not even available yet unless you're building from source to test the pre alpha progress

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 28 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Thunderbird May Disclose Information To: Mozilla Affiliates: Thunderbird is a project of MZLA Technologies Corporation, a subsidiary of Mozilla Foundation and an affiliate of Mozilla Corporation, and as such, shares some of the same infrastructure. This means that, from time to time, your data (e.g., crash reports, and technical and interaction data) may be** disclosed to Mozilla Corporation and Mozilla Foundation**. If so, it will be maintained in accordance with the commitments we make in this Privacy Notice.

DNS servers, Standard Autoconfiguration URIs, and Mozilla's Configuration Database: To simplify the email set-up process, Thunderbird tries to determine the correct settings for your account by contacting Mozilla’s configuration database as well as external servers. These include DNS servers and standard autoconfiguration URIs. During this process, your email domain may be sent to Mozilla's configuration database, and your email address may be disclosed to your network administrators.

Amazon Web Services: Thunderbird uses Amazon Web Services (AWS) to host its servers and as a content delivery network. Your device’s IP address is collected as part of AWS’s server logs.

Email address providers (Desktop Only Legacy): Prior to version 128, Thunderbird partnered with Gandi.net and Mailfence to allow you to create a new email address through Thunderbird. If you choose to use this feature, your email address search terms are sent to Gandi.net and Mailfence to return available addresses. In addition, your country location is also shared to provide the correct prices. You can learn more about Gandi.net’s and Mailfence’s data practices by reading their privacy notices.

Always good to read TOS and PP of an service.

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 5 points 1 hour ago

I'm always confused when people are surprised by something like an account sync meaning that the operators have to store your data

Makes me wonder if they understand how Lemmy works...

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml -3 points 4 hours ago

The Vivaldi browser has an inbuild Mail client, which share nothing to third parties. Vivaldi is complete independent from third party investors and share nothing with other companies.

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

lol, what a shitshow. A product from the same company is distancing from the stench. Good on them, but it shows who did some things wrong.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 minute ago

It's a different piece of software. It makes no sense for them to adopt the Firefox Terms of Use, no matter how they might think of them.

[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

MZLA is a different subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If I remember correctly, Thunderbird isn't a Mozilla product anymore but it's maintained by the community. Mozilla just hosts it.

[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

It was community maintained, then MZLA Corp was formed under the Mozilla Foundation. Deals to house Thunderbird under other foundations fell through, which is why it’s still under the Mozilla Foundation.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Wasn't sure if there were better places to post this, feel free to cross-post if you know other fitting communities :)

[–] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 hours ago

Thank you for posting it by the way. This is both good, and important news

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 10 points 7 hours ago

Cross posted to !opensource@programming.dev, and looks like someone already shared it on !thunderbird@lemmy.world

[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Great! I'm very happy with Thunderbird and with all this Mozilla nonsense i was worry that I had to leave it.

[–] Far@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago
[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (4 children)

I understand why people are so mad at Firefox/mozilla but honestly? I just don’t know of any viable alternative right now. Chrome, Safari, edge, etc are all categorically worse offerings because of their parent companies/policies.

Can someone please give me a non-chromium, Mobile and browser desktop suggestion? Firefox has so many QoL things I depend on. I need something that can use major extensions and such.

Edit: iOS is the real issue here for me

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 34 minutes ago

The only alternative is the Konqueror browser (KDE) for the Linux user, it has it's own KHTML engine by KDE (Grandfather of WebKit and Blink)

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Mozilla's new TOU only covers pre built Firefox executables, not the source code.

Librewolf and Waterfox are good forks that would not be bound to the TOU.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for an actual answer

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

You're welcome. I've been covering this issue since it's been announced. There are a number of accounts who are either deliberately spreading misinformation or who have a very poor understanding of how software licenses work.

Anyone who tells you that these terms are normal for a locally run browser is making the posts in bad faith.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 35 minutes ago

My lord, you’re the one who misunderstands licenses. And all internet browsers are “locally run” that’s literally what makes them browsers. They browse non-local resources.

Just for one major example, literally chrome has a ToS.

You’re the one arguing in bad faith. Holy shit you’re spreading so much misinformation it’s astounding.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for further explaining.

I’ve been super frustrated by lemmy posting vague info then going to watch some Linux and selfhosting YouTubers for them to only explain or gossip the issue for 20 minutes without alternatives.

So far trying librefox.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

Librewolf btw.

I've personally moved to Waterfox and very much enjoying the experience, with a few hiccups.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Those don’t work on iOS sadly and it’s a bit of a workaround to get on MacOS.

[–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

The Walled Garden is actually the problem, then.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Ok… I have a Linux machine too. But I need apple devices for my work as well. I’m asking for solutions not “ditch your phone and computer for different ones.”

[–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

Sorry, wasn't trying to agitate, just spewing on the Net.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

There may be Mac specific browsers that might be a better fit. I don't use a Mac personally but could be worth going through the App store to see what is out there.

[–] psyspoop@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Librewolf is a fork of Firefox.

From their site:

LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM.

In the future, Ladybird or a browser built on top of Servo might be alternatives, but both projects are pretty far from being usable right now.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Appreciate the suggestion but iOS. Silly of me to forget that in the initial comment

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I know pretty much nothing about iOS, but isn't Safari actually considered a pretty decent browser? Can you not use ublock (or equivalent), and other privacy extensions, on Safari?

[–] VerseAndVermin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I am trying Floorp as of yesterday. I like Zen Browser, but their github contributers list makes it look like it's mostly the effort of one person and that always gives me pause until somethings been around a while. Floorp seemed more spread out so I decided to try it despite its silly name.

I'm interested in how ladybird shapes up.

Worth noting that you may have DRM issues on some forks with video content. I don't think you will on Linux, and someone clear this if you can, but I think the alternate used can't do 4k video? I'm not a big web media consumer so idk. Has something to do with Widevine I think.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

I am also rooting for ladybird but yeah sadly not ready yet

[–] Palladiumasteroid@piefed.social 0 points 6 hours ago

Good to know that they'll be training AI on its users only on their browser. What a relief /s

Thunderbird's been isolated and isolated itself from wider Mozilla from sometime, so this doesn't surprise me. It belongs to a different subsidiary and everyday it becomes more separated from other Mozilla products. It's just there.