this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
1631 points (99.2% liked)

Fediverse

29263 readers
1201 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

his post on mastodon is here:

https://mastodon.social/@pixelfed/113849098386232034

Dear Mark, I hope this finds you well. I noticed something interesting today - it seems Instagram is blocking links to my little open-source project. You know, the one that lets people share photos without harvesting their personal data or forcing algorithmic feeds on them. I have to admit, I'm flattered. Who would've thought a small team of volunteers could build something that would catch your attention? We're just trying to give people a choice in how they share their memories online. No VCs, no surveillance capitalism, just code and community. Remember when Facebook started? It was about connecting people, not maximizing engagement metrics. Our project might be tiny compared to Instagram, but we're staying true to that original spirit of social media - giving people control over their online presence without turning them into products. You could've ignored us. Instead, by blocking our links, you've given us the best endorsement we could ask for. You've confirmed what we've been saying all along - that big tech is more interested in protecting their walled gardens than fostering genuine innovation. Every time you block a link to our platform, you remind people why we built it in the first place. Your action tells them there are alternatives worth exploring, ones that respect their privacy and agency. So thank you, Mark. You've turned our little project into a symbol of resistance against digital monopolies.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Xed@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

Why did the pixelfed creator have to fuck this up and treat his own community horribly? And such timing too. ( the pixelfed creator was acting horribly to the mastodon and other fediverse programmers and they came out and made a statement about how they don’t like being treated that way )

[–] ad_on_is@lemm.ee 10 points 6 days ago

While I really wish for PixelFed to take off, like Mastodon and Lenmy did, the current situation, IMHO, is just confusing to say the least.

So, here are two pixelfed mobile apps, an older one which is just a wrapper of the web version, and a newer polished one.

I've the new "polished" one installed for a few months now, and it seemes as if it's development has stalled. The app just feels unfinished at this point.

Now, I get it, it's a volunteer project, and there are probably just a handful of people working on it. And this is totally fine, I'm not expecting them to deliver an Instagram clone anytime soon.

However, a few months ago, they announced "Loops", with pre-signups and some marketing yada yada... All this, while there's still an unfinished app for their core product. But, I went ahead and signed up, just to find out, it was just crickets for a few months.

Then, recently I logged in again (on the web), and saw an they have an App for Loops which seems to be in the works, and upon testing it, I came to the same conclusion, it's just an unfinished barebones TikTok.

Again, I'm not ranting about PixelFed, but IMHO, if they want to get serious, they should focus on one thing, until time and resources allow them to explore other things.

I would love to see it succeed as an alternative.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 days ago

They wrote that to the guy with People just submitted it. I don't know why. They "trust me". Dumb fucks.?

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Cringy, inaccurate, and reeks of arrogance. 200k users. I bet it got blocked because some bot started spamming the platform.

At the end of the day, the critical mass of users will be based on 2 things. Ease of use or engagement and content. Content creators won't go to platforms that don't bring in money or get yelled at for trying to make money.

[–] thbb@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Now I understand why I didn't care closing my Facebook account years ago: it was for cross posting this sort of information.

Even if my Facebook feed is a sad desert, I hope I can be censored by the guy who rejects fact checkers

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

That is one kick ass last name!

We got

Ault

Nault

Renault

And Supernault!

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 321 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Remember when Facebook started? It was about connecting people

I remember that it was about abusing the private information of all the "dumb fucks" who created an account.

The letter is good though, but zucky will still be a billionaire whether he will read it or not.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 114 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wasn't it about ranking female students by attractiveness or something?

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah also facebook started as an evolution of men rating women on his campus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Facebook#Facemash It should be no surprise that zuck has recently started proclaiming that he wants a more masculine corporate identity, it's been that way from the beginning

"The Kirkland Facebook (referring to the Kirkland House intranet) is open on my computer desktop, and some of these people have pretty horrendous Facebook pictures. I almost want to put some of these faces next to pictures of farm animals and have people vote on which is more attractive." - Zuck, 2003

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s just it. Zuck could sell off and close shop and live large for the rest of his life. And yet he chooses to fuck around with people instead.

It’s weird.

There’s creating. And then there’s harvesting content and creations of others. The former is the only one that makes you interesting.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

When you think about it, too, you realize these people have nothing good inside them. They seek power because externally people covet power. Normal people covet power because they want control of their own lives but mark has control and doesn't fucking get it. He thinks power is inherently good so he steals it all away for himself but no matter how hard he trys he can't look inward and find anything that means something more than that. It's truly sad and grotesque. My mind could be set on 100 different paths that would fill me with so much satisfaction that nothing else would matter and mark can't find one for himself.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was first provided to college/edu addresses. It wasn't what it is today at all.

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 85 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As evil as it's sounds, he's not wrong.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 149 points 1 week ago (2 children)

for clarity he built Facebook to rate how hot women at his college were...

This letter reads like if Zuck was an ideologically driven tech-anarchist that wanted to connect people that became old and fell for the money but that's not really true lol

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

To be clearer he stole the whole thing because he was always an entitled sack of poo. He never created a thing, just like Elon.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 122 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The dream: releasing a scathingly cordial open letter to an oligarch that has a real chance of ruining their day.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It would probably work on Musk. I'll bet you his ego is that fragile.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

Nah, musks to much of a manly man to be bothered by it.

Adrian Dittman might lose his goddamn mind, however.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] tamlyn@lemmy.zip 89 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Connecting Threads in a stupid way to the fediverse but blocking a fediverse website at the same time. I don't need to understand that right?

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But guise we should let them federate!

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah, I argued against that at the beginning and I got downvoted into the dirt. Curious.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago

Never heard of them until this Streisand created issue.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 41 points 1 week ago (14 children)

The only Meta product I'm kinda forced to have is Whatsapp, as my work and my family use that to communicate, and I have tried to explain Signal to my mom, but to no avail.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

"Oh hi Mark..."

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why are you trying to appeal to the better nature of a bad faith actor....

Because this is free advertising as well

[–] M33@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 1 week ago

Having just joined pixelfed, struggling a bit to discover it, I find this letter greatly motivating 😎

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Any project with a countdown timer, "days till Zuckerberg blocks us" is one I can get behind.

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I'm all for pixelfed. I have a pixelfed account. This is a fun way to talk about the project.

I was pretty surprised at how the app is essentially a complete clone of IG. like the styling and layout of every button is pixel for pixel the exact same as IG. Innovation is one thing but copying everything about a program and calling it your own I'm not so sure about.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I mean zuckerberg stole the whole idea of Facebook from the winkleboss twins in the first place. Bought Instagram because he doesn’t gave the ability to create new good products. Then he copied Snapchat’s short form video into Instagram. So I’ve zero sympathy for him or Meta as they just copy shit and all their own ideas are shit (ex. now introducing legs). But if it were my project I’d make sure its different enough so won’t lose it if it’s sued for that

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›