this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
77 points (95.3% liked)

World News

32045 readers
727 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vodkasolution@feddit.it 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Definitely right but they lack political stability, a key asset in long term plans

[–] appel@whiskers.bim.boats 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Right, and why are they lacking political stability?

[–] gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Because we destabilise them so they do not develop to powerful societies, that won't do cheap labour for us anymore.

[–] Anon819450514@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

Pretty much what France is doing with the old colonies

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think it's mostly natural resources, there is still a huge amount of natural resources in Africa exploited by western companies.

[–] appel@whiskers.bim.boats 1 points 11 months ago

In the mind of the coloniser, cheap labour is a natural resource, and both must be exploited fully

[–] elfio@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Asking the real questions

[–] comedy@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

I blame those evil hippoes. We think they just eat and chase people. They've been up to much worse for a very long time.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The problem of industrialising was always organisational, in Europe just as much as Africa. If the rest of the world disappeared it would naturally develop over probably a couple centuries, since the process has started. The question for developing nations today is how to do it faster than that.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Some countries have demonstrated how it can be done much faster than Europe and the US did it.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yep. I'm not sure about Meiji Japan, but both the tiger economies and the Soviets did it by building on the existing European industrial economies. In the tiger's case, they bought easy to operate industrial machinery and ran it with cheap domestic labour for profitable export back to advanced economies, in Stalin's case he hired American contractors to build and train replica American factories in the USSR. After that, they could take the new resources and institutional experience and use it to build up to a next step.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

Interesting article that lays out the challenges, opportunities, and some ideas for solutions.