this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
521 points (96.8% liked)

Memes

45244 readers
2143 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] imnotfromkaliningrad@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago

are you trying to imply something about my boy shashka?

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

How about make it straight for a bit, then it do a little back curve near the end?

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago

Real swords have curves 😤

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"What does Katana mean?"

"It means Japanese sword"

  • Samurai Cop
[–] Vivendi@lemmy.zip 4 points 23 hours ago

Fucking legendary

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hey, have you seen those Japanese? They have curved swords. Curved... Swords...!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago

Persians absolutely malding right now.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

Psst... hail Sithis.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Have you seen those warriors from Hammerfell? They've got curved swords.

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago

Curved! Swords!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Sword but very curved and yet not very famous (Ethiopian shotel)

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Pretty famous among FromSoft fans.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 6 points 19 hours ago

Dex build rejoice

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This looks more like a scythe that doubles as a weapon to me

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It was probably inspired by Egyptian khopesh since it was used in Ethiopia even before the kingdom of Axum. Thing is, the blade is sharp on both sides. So you could either use its inner side as big sickle to reach around enemy shield and try for the weak spots like neck, face or armpits, or if the enemy didn't had a shield you could turn it to outer side and in this case it was similar to Persian shamshir in being excellent weapon against unarmored opponents.

Two more interesting thing about it was 1: the designs varies greatly, most were shorter and wider, the curvature also varied; and 2: it apparently worked quite well considering it has been in use for possibly over 2500 years and some Ethiopian emperors even organised special elite units wielding it.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't a khopesh sharp on the other side of the curve from a shotel, though? It seems like sharpening the inside was the big innovation that makes shotels distinctive

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago

Yes, it was upgrade of khopesh.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] simple@lemm.ee 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While you were out there whacking your straight stick, I spent years studying the blade...

Katana snaps in half after first swing

[–] Egg_Egg@lemm.ee 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The whole "Japanese steel was really weak" thing is as much of a myth as the whole "katanas are super powerful superior weapons" thing.

They're all just swords, and don't make that much of a difference either way.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (9 children)

According to whom?

The reason why Japanese iron is inferior is because of the source of the iron itself, they utilized iron sand instead of rock ore. Rock ore can be made up to 90% ferrous material while the iron sand contains as little as 2%.

This means when you smelt your source material into blooms of iron and slag, the blooms made from sand iron were much smaller. Instead of utilizing a single bloom to make a sword, the Japanese had to work several blooms together. Which is much more labour intensive, and can lead to a lot of imperfections in the final product.

This is why katanas were made out of so little material, and had to be handled with care. They were much more fragile pieces than similar swords made in Korea and China at the time.

Plus, the Japanese developed their iron working much later than their mainland contemporaries, as they never independently invented furnace technology. The technology for furnaces was imported, most likely from the Korean peninsula.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Katana's are weak on the flat side. They aren't really meant to be used for parrying. In fact, most sword fights in Japan would be over after the first or second swing. It was commonplace to hold the grip of a katana but not draw it in such a way so that your enemy has trouble judging how long your katana is and what is a safe distance to be from you. Once your opponent is in range, draw it quickly and kill them in one blow, ideally.

The act of killing your opponent in a single blow is called "nukitsuke" from "nukiuchi" meaning "to cut down an opponent" and "tsuke" meaning "to stop an opponent's attack before it begins".

The Sekiro and popular media image of extended katana fights didn't really happen, but if they did, there would almost certainly be some broken katanas.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I promise you, in the real world, fights were just as much of a shield shoving match while trying to slash your opponents ankle as they were in Europe.
The idea of a one-on-one sword fight decided by individual skill is much more of a romantic idea.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I imagine it like a hockey match where when a stick breaks they just go get another one and continue on like nothing happened

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah, Japanese steel wasn’t great, but they were working with what they had available at the time. Katanas were basically made out of iron dust, which had been melted into slag by filtering through charcoal. The resulting chunks of steel were basically straight up slag, not nice even ingots. So the steel they got was actually extremely high carbon in places, but that also meant it was brittle as hell, because those carbon pockets were prone to shattering.

So the folding was invented, to even out the steel’s carbon content (just like how a Damascus steel blade has visible stripes, Japanese steel had invisible stripes of high and low carbon steel) and to lower the carbon content overall; Every time you heat for another fold, you’re evaporating some carbon. So the folding process took the steel from extremely high carbon pockets to a more evenly distributed carbon content.

Now that modern steel processing exists, the only real reason to stick to the folding method is tradition. There’s no need to fold modern steel ingots because they’re already homogenous and can be produced at whatever carbon level you want.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Now that modern steel processing exists, the only real reason to stick to the folding method is tradition.

And looks. Those folding create a wavy pattern on the blade which is desirable feature for collector.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

If you’re referring to the wavy pattern along the cutting edge, that’s not from the folding process. The hamon is added to the blade during the quenching process, by adding clay to the steel. The clay causes the covered steel to heat differently than the uncovered steel. That differential heating is what is visible as the hamon.

It’s largely decorative, but does have function as it determines what part of the blade can be sharpened to an edge.

[–] Egg_Egg@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Impurities are melted into slag. Not the iron. That's what slag is.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 1 points 20 hours ago

There is still benefit to hot forging the steel to refine and align the microstructure, but it doesn’t have to be many folds.

[–] _bcron@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not into swords at all but I imagine it's a lot easier to rake the edge of the blade across a surface if it's angled away like a scimitar and more likely to just thwap something perpendicularly with a straight blade. 'Papercut theory' of sorts

[–] Egg_Egg@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

Yeah they're a bit better at slashing whilst a straight sword is slightly better at thrusting. Typically a curved sword is a bit better whilst on horseback or whilst fighting unarmoured or lightly armoured opponents and straight blades are a bit better whilst fighting one-on-one and against somewhat more armoured opponents.

But these are slight differences and sword styles are also varied in each region, so the Japanese did develop swords which were more adapted to thrusting with reinforced tips and Europeans did develop swords which were more effective at slashing.

I think some people obsess over what swords are the best and the worst. In reality the style of sword was unlikely to be the major deciding factor in a one on one fight. The amount and quality of armour and the skill and capacity (Size and strength) of the fighters themselves are much bigger factors.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well it's no 1896 pattern light cavalry saber...

[–] SSJMarx@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago

As far as swords go, the gladius is still the goat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

To be fair it is sharp enough to cut through atoms and space time destroying the fabric of reality allowing you to turn back time to the Big Bang and reshape the universe in your image.

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I've been watching a japanese sword master on YT demonstrating moves. It's very interesting how they decide when they pull it out which side of the curve they lead with, a choice they make in a split second, and the different attacks each method would have. Even European swords weren't just sharp hammers, they had practical moves and defenses lost in the movies.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

most members of the warrior class were little more than brutish thugs. A handful would have taken the strategy of individual combat seriously and they would have done quite well.

The majority of the people they were fighting were lightly armored at best and they could get away with just swinging the sharp end at the unfortunate peasant conscripted to try to stop them.

There are plenty of examples of knights and samurai alike, falling for just the most obvious trap you could imagine. Templars charging in to open gates, samurai rushing to duel a guy who insulted them, in both cases blood drunk and stupid, children of privilege and in armor by accident of birth.

The Last Duel is a decent example of what happens when guys like that and up fighting each other.

We tend to have a romantic view of the past, but we have a great Instagram filter between us and then. Reality is ugly and violent. Few people are artists, even fewer are talented artists. This is true whether they're painting or drawing blood.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

I mean... That still works. In Iraq the US Army routinely ran bait ambushes in areas AQ was known to operate. Oh look a single vehicle and they're waving beer bottles around. That's not a trap at all... Meanwhile there's an entire infantry platoon traveling dark and silent just out of the light behind them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

I worked with a super nice weird guy. He was always bringing in his 3d printed warhammer sets to the shop. Respect. One day he was talking about his sword. I was like, did you buy the sword in a mall? And he said yes, he bought it in a mall. I should have let it go. Anyways I am not friends with that guy.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The same guy would write a five-page essay about how much similar curved swords like scimitars and sabres suck, and might actually die if he is shown a khopesh or a shotel.

load more comments
view more: next ›