this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
1071 points (97.3% liked)

Memes

45280 readers
2116 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Robsadaisy@lemmy.world 235 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is high art and belongs in a museum. I'm not joking.

[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I unironically agree. 2nd place looks more like a dog, but 1st place feels more like a dog.

[–] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Starshader@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 year ago

Can confirm, she were high while drawing that dog.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exceedingly accurate depiction, first place was warranted

The fact that 1st place could cite a credible source is what really does it for me.

[–] HerrKai@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is this the actual ACTUAL picture or some sort of AI recreation based on the drawing?

[–] Rexios@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AI image generation wasn’t a thing when this happened 10 years ago

[–] HerrKai@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For all I knew this could have been a very recent post or even if this was 10 years ago someone could've created that image on the left very recently

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

The image on the left was posted with the drawing 10ish years ago.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

The actual picture was something like that.

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No it was a person that recreated their children's images in Photoshop.

At least that's how I remember it.

[–] moipe@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] 3ntranced@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] klemptor@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah greyhounds be awkward like that

[–] clubb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well, the second place is more crafty, but where's the fun in that? There would be huge amounts of similar nice pictures in the competition. The first place makes me laugh and uses a way to look at the dog shape that I haven't seen before. I prefer this added value to perfect technique.

[–] OrangeXarot@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

my father that teaches drawing in a comics school always says "drawing iperrealistic is easy, having your artstyle is very difficult and most of the time people don't have one"

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago
[–] SquareBear@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

Title was doggy mcdogface

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Artstyle vs art quality

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are yoir favorite noises to make while ln discord calls?

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gmQI_N9ifE

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Honestly, I think it shows how throughly democracy fails to deliver what reality is and how feelings dictate the choices people make.

[–] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When it comes to art the goal is to make the person experiencing the art feel something. Whether that be awe, happiness, sadness, anger, etc. The 1st place winner gave me (and apparently most people) a more intense emotional reaction so it's better art.

Now, as for the skill level on display, the 2nd one obviously takes more skill, but skill is only one component of art and depending on your end goal it can be completely unimportant to the piece.

So no, democracy didn't fail, it delivered exactly what it should have in this instance.

[–] Jwmartin0988@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am cynical, or is it more likely that the winner was voted in fOaR Le mEMes? I'm not invalidating your appreciation of the second entry, I'm just sceptical that it was elected in sincerity.

[–] Misconduct@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago

I mean... memes can bring the same joy as art in their own way. I would argue that memes are a form of art anyway. A very accessible and universal type of art. If it inspired people to vote for it then they must have felt some kinda way even if it was just silly shenanigans

[–] gizmonicus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

This might be true, but there's something about how bad this picture is that I don't think I could do worse. It's uniquely bad in such a profound way that it would require real skill to make something more universally terrible.

[–] Perditija@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

I think it's completely valid to vote according to your feelings. That's how you determine what you find important in those you vote for. Drawings are a form of art and the purpose of art is to invoke specific feelings in the consumer - apparently more people enjoyed the first drawing and voted for it, which is completely valid for a competition for "drawings"; it wasn't a competition for drawing skills, just the pictures themselves.

What I find much more problematic for democracy is misinformation, especially if deliberate by news outlets, politicians or lobbyists. They know how to manipulate feelings to get what they want.

🤔 What system should we make, then? No system we've ever made so far has worked. There's always endless suffering no matter what we do or how hard we try politically.

[–] snowraven@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Tough competition

[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Deserved winner

[–] altec@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Absolute classic

Didn't a little kid draw the first one and that's why it won?

[–] jedi_hamster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least this once, it objectively has not.

[–] orphiebaby@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Pure democracy = rule of the stupid because there's more of them.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

yeah ok you're all so quirky because you like the shitty drawing or whatever.

And we called it Doggy McDogface.

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

i know, people are just supporting the second place one to be 'quirky' cause it's the underdog

[–] 1draw4u@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

No one knows what it means, but it's provocative! Also art is complicated.