this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
158 points (90.7% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
3617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 128 points 4 months ago (21 children)

trustworthy AI

Our initial offering will include ChatGPT, Google Gemini, HuggingChat, and Le Chat Mistral

What

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 106 points 4 months ago (16 children)

people please actually read the article not the headline; this is literally about accessibility improvements for blind and visually impaired people for generating alt text inside of documents and pdfs.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's one of the things, but it's also adding a dedicated sidebar for AI. That's the sort of thing that should just be an extension, there's absolutely no reason at all why that needs to be something built into the browser.

Developers should be providing alt text themselves, but in cases where they aren't having a local image recognition model running to provide a description isn't terrible as long as it's either 100% local or completely opt-in.

The dedicated sidebar on the other hand feels very much like a cheap attempt to cash in on the AI fad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] proti@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

yeah but AI bad no matter if it would be actually useful for once

[–] cheddar@programming.dev 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

access their preferred AI service from the Firefox sidebar to summarize information, simplify language, or test their knowledge, all without leaving their current web page.

Our initial offering will include ChatGPT, Google Gemini, HuggingChat, and Le Chat Mistral

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Poot@discuss.tchncs.de 65 points 4 months ago (2 children)

"Trustworthy AI" + Recent aquisiton of an advertising analytics company + a call for people to inform on third party sources of Firefox = Down the enshitification rabbit hole we go.

[–] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Any recommendations of a good alternative on android? I'm thinking I'll move to librewolf on desktop but they don't appear to have an android version.

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I use a fork from F-Droid called Fennec. I'm not sure off the top of my head how closely it tracks with upstream feature-wise but I know it strips out all of Mozilla's tracking components and it's always updated within a couple days of the upstream release.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I do like Mull, but I'm also uninformed and I don't use my mobile browser all too much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I use Fennec F-Droid on Android and LibreWolf on Linux/Mac/Windows.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maxinstuff@lemmy.world 58 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why does my open source browser need proprietary SaaS products stuffed into it?

Isn't this what extensions are for?

[–] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It also has google stuffed into it, and apparently the new consensus is that you need AI just as much for browsing as a search engine

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 44 points 4 months ago (26 children)

I wish they spent their time fixing bugs, rather than implementing this bullshit

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 33 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Our initial offering will include ChatGPT, Google Gemini, HuggingChat, and Le Chat Mistral, but we will continue adding AI services that meet our standards for quality and user experience.

Is that the same Mozilla that started the Joint Statement on AI Safety and Openness?

What in living hell do proprietary and predatory AI services even doing here?

Mozilla just offered users to feed into the very abomination they claim to fight.

Also, for all things "AI", local is the only way to go if you ever want to have a chance at privacy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Honestly, the worst part of the AI craze is that so many people hear AI now and immediately hate it even though it can really do some amazing stuff, e.g. in medicine. AI as a blanket term just has so much variance, there's a ton of trash and a ton of great stuff.

[–] yukijoou@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 months ago

"AI" today mostly refers to LLMs, and whichever LLM you're using, you'll likely face the same issues (wrong answers creeping in, tending towards mediocrity in its answers, etc.) - those seem to be things you have to live with if you want to use LLMs. if you know you can't deal with it, another rebrand won't help anything

[–] firepenny@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Part of the problem is that all ads anymore want push their version of “AI” in your face and some of these “AI” are nothing new just rebranded.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The new CEO of Mozilla, Laura Chambers, has a background working at all sorts of evil companies like AirBnB and PayPal. Its absolutely no surprise that the company immediately dropped plans to diversify in ethical, unique and privacy friendly ways as soon as she joined.

CEOs getting paid primarily in stock means grifters like this will drop their USP for whatever trend makes the line go up, if it is crypto, NFTs, or AI.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Shes not the new ceo, shes a temporary interim ceo while they find someone better

[–] 299792458ms@lemmy.zip 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not going to lie, AI can be a very powerfull tool but the "we want your browsing experience to be divine, but don't worry we have your back" scares me shitless. Firefox has always had our backs, why do they feel the need to mention it now? Maybe I'm being paranoid but I feel like a browser shoulf just be a browser.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Pretty sure the only thing I wouldn't object to AI being used for in Firefox would be ad blocking. Surely they're going to use this for that right?

...

Right?

...

Shit.

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

native tab grouping would be a much more desirable feature, to me

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Why Mozilla? Why? You were the chosen one... Fuck it, I'm going back to lynx! Tabs? Sure we have tabs in lynx, just run lynx in tmux

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nick@midwest.social 11 points 4 months ago

No fuckin’ thanks.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago

The way I see AI being implemented into Firefox, regardless of whether it's gonna be opt-in or out in the future is that they need to keep up with the latest browser trends in the future. If they don't, they will definitely lose more of whatever probably small amount of remaining normies who don't use edge or chrome but instead opt for Firefox. They're not tech literate enough to see a conveniently placed ad telling them that xyz browser now uses AI security features and Firefox doesn't and discern the fact that it's a ploy to get them to switch. We need more normies if we really want a chance to keep Firefox more than just treadingn water, and the best way is to offer more random bullshit of the week to keep them from switching to a competitor.

[–] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 4 months ago
[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Any good forks without AI? I really don't want that AI companies with my data.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

As long as I can disable it, sure. Knock yourself out.

[–] captainjaneway@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I think it makes sense. I like ChatGPT and I appreciate having easy access to it. What I really wish is the option to use local models instead. I realize most people don't have machines that can tokenize quickly enough but for those that do...

[–] maxinstuff@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Seconding this. Why not allow people to run llama3 or other open source models?

[–] ahal@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 months ago

From the post:

Whether it’s a local or a cloud-based model, if you want to use AI, we think you should have the freedom to use (or not use) the tools that best suit your needs

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›