this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
334 points (99.1% liked)

Android

17623 readers
82 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 92 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This seems similar to the EUs requirements. It really speaks about the US laws when even archaic Japanese legislators (see Japanese copyright laws) are ahead of that market in customer rights/options.

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Has the US ever been ahead of any of its peers when it comes to consumer rights?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

No, but it also stands to profit from those violations of consumer rights, where other countries do not.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Has the US ever been ahead of any of its peers when it comes to consumer rights?

Fair Use is cool.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In principle it is cool, but large corporations can still bully you into submission even when it should fall under Fair Use.

[–] rdrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ahhh America. "Yeah we're wrong, but we can afford lawyers for centuries, lol good luck" land of the free

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 4 months ago

It’s ridiculous. I think the law should be written with the expectation that the common citizen cannot afford legal counsel for an unlimited period of time.

I am not a lawyer.

[–] chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

How is that ahead? You mean in head count?

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

That might be the only thing, actually.

[–] recursive_recursion@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

We're trending in the right direction but we're not at all in a position to be saying we're better than anyone on that front, given how much industry pushback there's been.

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 14 points 4 months ago

At the very least it's seems heavily inspired by the Digital Markets Act, which is why I'd hope that their wording will be specific enough to close those "loopholes" Apple is currently attempting in the EU.

[–] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Ooh, ooh, do the nintendo switch next!

There's a lot of irony here considering how so many Japanese companies have a track record of pulling this kind of shit themselves.

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The switch is already open source at this point thanks to all the awesome homebrew people

[–] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I meant their app store, as per this article

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I see. I misunderstood that. Sorry

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This will forbid "Prevent application developers from using features controlled by the OS with the same level of performance as the one used by Designated Providers."

Which is a huge win if it is enforced.

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 6 points 4 months ago

It sounds vague and will either end up being a very powerful tool or almost useless. If it's the former, it would be gigantic win indeed.

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Google already was?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago