125
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck hydrogen. Its a fake green product so oil companies can transition as slow as they want while still keeping their strangle hold on our society.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It depends a lot on where the hydrogen is sourced from. Hydrogen that is generated from electrolyzers using renewable power is completely green (and funny enough, called Green Hydrogen), and is a good way to store excess energy from solar and wind.

Oil companies however want to market hydrogen from drilling and refining, which is dirty as hell.

It's an important differentiation to make though. Hydrogen is not inherently bad and will have plenty of green applications. We just have to make sure it's coming from the right places.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Sadly almost all hydrogen currently making its way to market is dirty. I have high hopes for it in the future but it seems like thinly veiled poison at the moment.

And this article is definitely about the dirty kind or at least feels like it is.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

There's companies working on it! ~~We're just broke~~

And yes, this is definitely the dirty kind. It may still be an improvement on using natural gas directly, but there would need to be a fairly comprehensive analysis to tell for sure. One possible advantage though is we could start building up a hydrogen infrastructure that we can then feed green hydrogen into and completely replace the dirty hydrogen.

Anyway though, you're right to be skeptical. It's important though to look into the details to determine if it's legitimately green energy or if it's just oil companies greenwashing. We need to shun the latter while we promote the former.

(There is a grey area, and it's the same as electric cars -- if we're using electricity from the grid to power cars, and electrolyzers which make hydrogen, is it truly green? I would say this is acceptable for the same reason EVs are acceptable. It'll become completely emission free once the grid is run on renewables.)

[-] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

and is a good way to store excess energy from solar and wind.

Is it really that good of a storage method, though? The round-trip efficiency is quite bad when compared to other methods of storage.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

We'll need it anyway to produce existing chemical materials sustainably. It may not be the best energy carrier nor most efficient, but it shines in specific applications. Vehicles are a promising example.

[-] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

There are some use-cases where hydrogen will be useful, but I don't think storage is one of them. Nor do I think vehicles are a particularly good use-case either, as compared to just iterating on battery technology.

[-] RarePossum@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

Acording to this paper/article, its better than technologies such as batteries, but the study isn't the most comprehensive and doesn't consider things like pump hydro.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 1 points 2 weeks ago

"That good of a storage method" in terms of what, arbitrage? We should be producing hydrogen for the practical and environmental benefits of having emissions-free vehicle fuel (that avoids the problems of battery production and disposal), steel, and fertilizer.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Zrybew@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago

We're about to make Fracking look like a great idea 😂

[-] fubarx@lemmy.ml 32 points 2 weeks ago

Wait. Am I getting this right? They want to inject high-pressure steam and chemicals into a massive underground natural gas reservoir. Then set off a big fire + explosion.

Surely, nothing can go wrong.

[-] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's called in situ combustion and apparently it's a well established practice in the petroleum industry: https://glossary.slb.com/en/terms/i/in-situ_combustion

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 weeks ago

So is coal extraction. How long has that coal fire burned under that town? 60 years?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] ianovic69@feddit.uk 9 points 2 weeks ago

I'm no expert, but this doesn't sound like a good idea.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

First of all, they spelled Heelys wrong. Second, Heelys are a great idea, even better as an adult in an office with polished concrete floors.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

So heely wheels deliberately pluralize wrong?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yes because igniting fires underground is a GREAT idea!

Centralia,PA would like a word...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] weirdingmodule@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

What could possibly go wrong?

[-] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 7 points 2 weeks ago

This worst case scenario is probably the same as with any reservoir of natural gas (a massive leak and explosion), which is all the more reason to convert it to hydrogen and sequester the weaker, non-flammable GHG byproduct in situ.

[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I imagine that suddenly all the co2 stored as gas underground could suddenly come out and being odorless, kills the whole neighboring town

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Natural gas is also odorless and able to displace oxygen so I don’t see how it being CO2 underground instead of natural gas changes anything from a risk perspective. Maybe because the molecules are smaller and thus more prone to leaks? I’m admittedly way out of my depth here.

[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Methane is lighter than air and goes up while co2 is heavier than oxygen and stays down. I don’t know maybe in case of some disaster where water leaks in the well and then pushes out the co2

I wouldn’t want to live nearby in both cases anyway

[-] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I mean, all that methane coming out would probably be at least as bad, and the cavity had previously been filled with methane.

It'll be a cavern deep under a lot of rock. If it can contain methane for zillions of years, I imagine that it can contain carbon dioxide.

[-] Sewer_King@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'd be worried about the now excess co2 levels disrupting the normal saturation levels in the groundwater.

[-] towerful@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Sewer_King@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's what plants crave I guess.

[-] lath@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

This how you realize that there are people around that just want to blow shit up.

[-] Devdogg@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, something about this screams at me it's not right.

Why wouldn't this work? What would go wrong?

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

Producing hydrogen from natural gas still releases carbon in to the air.

[-] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 4 points 2 weeks ago

...which is the whole reason for doing the SMR within the natural reservoir and leaving the CO~2~ in there.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We could just give up on the idea that natural gas is “clean.”

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bamfic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

carbon monoxide? is that healthy for you?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
125 points (91.9% liked)

Technology

55559 readers
4215 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS