Technology

59086 readers

3617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

125

Scientists propose converting natural gas into hydrogen directly in gas fields (techxplore.com)

submitted 4 months ago by CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work to c/technology@lemmy.world

67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] weirdingmodule@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

What could possibly go wrong?

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 7 points 4 months ago

This worst case scenario is probably the same as with any reservoir of natural gas (a massive leak and explosion), which is all the more reason to convert it to hydrogen and sequester the weaker, non-flammable GHG byproduct in situ.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I imagine that suddenly all the co2 stored as gas underground could suddenly come out and being odorless, kills the whole neighboring town

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Natural gas is also odorless and able to displace oxygen so I don’t see how it being CO2 underground instead of natural gas changes anything from a risk perspective. Maybe because the molecules are smaller and thus more prone to leaks? I’m admittedly way out of my depth here.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Methane is lighter than air and goes up while co2 is heavier than oxygen and stays down. I don’t know maybe in case of some disaster where water leaks in the well and then pushes out the co2

I wouldn’t want to live nearby in both cases anyway

[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I mean, all that methane coming out would probably be at least as bad, and the cavity had previously been filled with methane.

It'll be a cavern deep under a lot of rock. If it can contain methane for zillions of years, I imagine that it can contain carbon dioxide.

[–] Sewer_King@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'd be worried about the now excess co2 levels disrupting the normal saturation levels in the groundwater.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sparkling water, on tap!

[–] Sewer_King@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

It's what plants crave I guess.