602
submitted 3 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 100 points 3 months ago

Literally almost every drug in existance.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 20 points 3 months ago

Then after the parent rubs out, they make a slightly different version and repatent it.

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 3 months ago

Insulin: new formula now 0.0005% more effective for only 9000% increase in profit!

[-] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Whoo boy that typo had me going at first lol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] blazera@lemmy.world 99 points 3 months ago

article doesnt present any pressure they are facing. also

Drug production costs are often shrouded in secrecy with little clarity on how they relate to prices, if at all.

Prices are never about cost, its what people are willing to pay. Which gets brutally exploited by pharmaceutical industry.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 61 points 3 months ago

obviously

anybody who believes pharma costs are justified by materials is... well, let's just call them uninformed. It's not justified by R&D costs or production issues. It's justified by the stock market, by the CEO having a race with other pharma CEOs for the biggest bonus, and by no other thing.

[-] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

I work in med device, close to pharma, but a bit different. There is a lot of overhead. Beyond all the validations required for startup of each line, there is quite a lot of Sustaining work.

I'm not trying to defend this price, or the gouging that pharma does regularly. But I don't think the $5 price includes all the overhead of the QMS.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I'm sure there are some costs associated with developing drugs, and I'm sure it's not cheap.

The problem still stands, though, and the solution is capping executive pay in public companies.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

It's justified by asking "how much money can we suck out of the people it helps?"

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

Meanwhile volvo assigns the patent for the 3-point seatbelt to the public domain because it will save countless lives.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

A Swedish company not being evil? What are they, the opposite of America?

[-] TeenieBopper@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Novo Nordisk is a Danish company, not American.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago

Double pop! First time I've seen a privacy popup on top of a privacy popup. The top one you can only accept.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Extra privacy wow!

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

Ah I see they are going the Roku route.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago

Well you see… there’s the yacht, the yacht they have to land the helicopter, and the smallish yacht they use to go into port because berths at dock are hard to come by.

Oh and the. There’s the helicopter, the pilots, the mansion in every state. Except, uh, the ones that tax rich people.

It’s all part of the cost…

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

CAD$650/month in Canada. I've lost 36 Kg (80 lbs) and I'm still losing weight. My blood work shows no signs of diabetes, my cardiac indicators are also excellent, but my hemoglobin is low because I don't eat beef anymore (not because of the Ozempic, I haven't been able to digest it for about six years.) I'm taking an iron supplement to build it back up.

Ozempic sucks until you stop fighting it. After that it's an easy ride.

I'm wearing an XL t-shirt and large sweat pants today down from 3XL in both eight months ago.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago
[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It acts by slowing down the emptying of your stomach. That means that whatever you eat stays in your stomach for many hours. If you eat too much at night or something that is acidy or spicy it causes terrible heart burn and reflux/regurgitation. I take an omeprazole with sodium bicarbonate at bedtime to relieve the acid.

I eat a granola bar or a couple of eggs for breakfast then a small bowl of whatever is on offer for dinner and that's it. My stomach is never empty. Sometimes, if I want to have something spicy or acidy I will have it for breakfast. I've had a fajita for breakfast and I once had chicken parm for breakfast. Then I eat something easy for dinner.

The most upsetting side effect was the fact that I went from a daily bathroom guy to every three or four days. I was eating so much less and my body was making such good use of what I ate that I just didn't produce much. It can cause constipation but you need to avoid taking laxatives because you can become dependant. Just drink lots of water, eat lots of fiber, and walk a lot and you will be fine.

If you fight it it's going to make you miserable. If you lean in you will lose a lot of weight fast. I've lost so much weight so quickly that my body freaks me out a bit. When I'm sitting on the edge of the bed and look down at my legs I don't recognize them. I told someone a few weeks ago that I just wanted a little candy because I'm fat and she said, "No you're not."

On the plus side I mentioned to my doctor that I was getting shorter (in in my late 50s and went from 5' 10 1/2" to 5' 9 1/2" and he asked, "Your penis?" I said, "No, that's getting longer!" He laughed and said, "It was hiding." I've actually gained an inch and a half of useable penis. (That's a happy side effect.)

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

There’s a lot of mistrust with drug makers at the moment, for good reason and this is a great article on the breakdown of costs. They do have a point about recouping the cost of R&D but maybe they should be more transparent about how long it’ll take them to do so. MBAs are very good at pulling levers to make money, they just don’t think about the human element, which is the most important lever.

[-] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Two points about R&D costs:

First, they aren't just trying to make up what they spent on this treatment, but others that failed during research/trials. There's a lot of them the general public will never hear about, and pharmas generally don't like to bring attention to their failures. Part of that is many shareholders are morons who don't understand how science works.

Second, the costs can get fuzzier for larger companies who in-house much of the R&D process, since the costs get shared among many programs. Properly attributing spend in that case can be a serious challenge.

All that said, they've clearly seen an opportunity to rake it in with this trendy drug and are charging way more than they need to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] STOMPYI@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Guys our government is broken.

[-] MSugarhill@feddit.de 18 points 3 months ago

As I read that they charge just 155 bucks in other countries I guess the high price lies in not having a suitable health care system. You can't have both, calling other countries socialists or communists AND having good health care by having the same contracts that we have. Sorry.

[-] systemglitch@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Universal Health Care is what Americans should be rioting for. It is THE game changer in QoL and what really separats a first world country from a second world country.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

$1500. That's how much eight weeks of ozempic costs for me if I had to pay out of pocket.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 3 months ago

Seriously, no kidding but sometimes I think that people are still discovering capitalism

[-] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm diabetic, and also have a few mental health issues. The doc took me off Ozempic, citing it's side affects of messing with mental health.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Sorry to hear it. What sort of side effects were there?

[-] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Doc said risks were reported of adversely affecting PTSD, depression, and suicidal thoughts.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

well you know the old adage, the bigger the margin, the better the rape

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Guy looks like Bill Gates without hair.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
602 points (97.3% liked)

News

21721 readers
3586 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS