this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
633 points (92.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21172 readers
901 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] git@lemmy.world 183 points 7 months ago

    Maybe the real bloat was the apps we needed all along

    [–] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 112 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    It's not bloat if you use it.

    [–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 27 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Then again, am I really using these Haskell libraries? I just want to use pandoc. I love Arch, but the organization of the official repos is sometimes suboptimal.

    [–] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 14 points 7 months ago

    you're right, installing pandoc on arch really comes with a lot of bloat. Iirc it's >200 haskell libraries.

    [–] goddard_guryon@sopuli.xyz 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    Last I checked (which was some time ago), pandoc-bin doesn't require the haskell dependencies. I saved quite some installation time (and screen space during installation) by switching.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 61 points 7 months ago (13 children)

    I never understand this obsession with "bloat" when you can buy a 1 TB SSD for € 50.

    [–] nitrolife@rekabu.ru 39 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

    or you can't buy if you're not successful enough or you're in the wrong country. For example, in my country, the minimum cost of a 1TB SSD is about $85 and a salary of $2,000 is considered a very successful salary at the upper limit

    [–] tubaruco@lemm.ee 17 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    bro a 256 gb ssd here costs 200+

    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] jack@monero.town 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    It's not about storage. It's about complexity getting back at you, for example not knowing what caused a problem because multiple programs are stepping on each others feet

    [–] GreatBlueHeron@lemmy.ca 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    For me it's not about the size, it's about the understanding. I'd really like to understand what everything on my system does and why it's there. It seems impossible with modern systems. Back in the '90s I needed a secure email relay - it had lilo, kernel, init, getty, bash, vi, a few shell utils (before busybox..), syslogd and sendmail. I'm not sure any more as it was a long time ago, but I think I even statically linked everything so there was no libc. I liked that system.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] cevn@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

    For me it was a problem with update frequency and how long they would take. Once i got rid of my flatpaks and moved to stable firefox i update once a week instead of daily now and it takes seconds instead of minutes. Probably also solvable with auto updates.

    load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 57 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    mfs with a 16 core cpu, 64gb ram and 10tb storage be like

    [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 months ago

    Hey! I have 128gb of ram

    …and still restart my browser if it’s using over 1 gb

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 45 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Every person who comments about “bloat” in their install should be required to preface their post or comment with a full definition of “bloat.”

    This shit is obnoxious.

    [–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I actually wonder if we could ever agree on a definition?

    Maybe:

    Bloat: any unnecessary, superfluous software, software package, or feature that is unused or unnecessarily inefficient, and/or uses system resources to an unessasary or unreasonable degree.

    What do you guys think? Because then we can still argue about bloat and what reasonable is! And that's what it's all about. Arguing for the sake of it!

    [–] muhyb@programming.dev 12 points 7 months ago

    Bloat is relative to every person / usage case but I agree with this definition.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 18 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Anything that's not kernel

    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

    Bloat = making your system usable

    • annoying people who whine about bloat
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] jroid8@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    You can use window managers instead of DEs. While I prefer DEs because how much features they have you may not need these features

    [–] lea@feddit.de 24 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Instructions unclear, installed sway and 50 utilities for it.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 38 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    Still way less bloated than win11 I'd wager

    [–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 36 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (12 children)

    Step 1. Install the most secure, pure, minimalist Linux distro

    Step 2. Get frustrated at the complications

    Step 3. Give up and go back to Windows

    • a story I've seen happen more than once
    [–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 20 points 7 months ago

    I've had the exact opposite experience on arch, mostly because of the arch wiki.

    1. Install arch using the arch wiki for reference
    2. If an issue arises, consult the arch wiki
    3. Document, contribute, and help others
    [–] pizzazz@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    For me unfortunately it has been Step 1 install literally the most universally compatible distro possible

    Step 2 audio drivers craps out. No fix is available. Trying to apply workarounds completely Bork the system

    Step 3 install again. graphics driver is problematic, refresh it giving it MOS permissions. I miss the MOS permission screen at the reboot. Look for how to do obtain that option again. No easy way to do it at all. Bork the system again

    Step 4 install again. Notice touch screen support is completely useless, and pen is not supported.

    Step 5 Ask myself if keeping a 1200$ computer with tinny audio, no graphic hardware acceleration and a half functional display can be justified in any way. It can't.

    Step 5. Back to windows. Bloated, but it works.

    Unfortunately system support is still very iffy on some models. I'd really like to embrace the distro life but can't.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] muhyb@programming.dev 33 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Don't install neofetch, so many dependencies.

    [–] starman@programming.dev 31 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    But how would he show that he uses Arch, without Neofetch?

    [–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)
    [–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 14 points 7 months ago
    [–] Pantherina@feddit.de 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    Neofetch is unmaintained btw, fastfetch is a good replacement... for whoever needs that. I wrote my own tool for getting system info and I like my terminals to have free space

    List of fetch tools

    Cool alternatives:

    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] Zozano@lemy.lol 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    Most people in this thread don't get it.

    You know how some people compete to see who can get Doom to run on the craziest platforms, like a calculator?

    Installing Arch with the fewest packages is like that. There's something oddly satisfying about stripping everything back to the most basic level - to make things work for you within the most constrictive environment you enforce for yourself.

    It's like eating a spicy shellfish dinner and super gluing your asshole closed.

    [–] Zink@programming.dev 21 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Arch Linux: It's like eating a spicy shellfish dinner and super gluing your asshole closed.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] Pohl@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Started playing with arch this week for the first time. Got a pretty good laugh when I realized that I forgot to install a dhcp client and had to boot the install media again to add networking.

    I appreciate what they’re doing and I’m going to keep poking at it, but my first impression is that philosophy is driving and the utility is in the back seat.

    [–] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    So just run archinstall Personally as a relative newbie I found arch a lot easier to deal with than fedora and ubuntu, both of which have had me in dependency hell on previous attempts to switch to linux. Not only that but I have a much better idea of what makes up my system.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    As someone who primarily uses Windows, Ubuntu didn't feel like it had any bloat when I tried it.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] Johanno@feddit.de 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

    Install minimal linux.

    Your ~/.config folder is 3GB

    [–] exploder@sopuli.xyz 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] Samueru@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] callyral@pawb.social 12 points 7 months ago
    > Install NixOS
    > Learn about Nix
    > Organise your dotfiles
    > Learn about flakes
    > Organise your dotfiles
    > Learn about modularisation
    > Organise your dotfiles
    > ...
    
    [–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    it's not bloat if i wanted it and installed it.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

    I have installed probably 100 packages on my arch install, it's still sitting at like 8gb used. Arch isn't the problem in this scenario

    [–] sagrotan@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

    Twelve window manager are not bloat, it's variety!

    [–] SrTobi@feddit.de 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I mean - you control what gets installed on Arch. One finger pointing at arch is three pointing back in this scenario...

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Flatpaks have helped me a lot reducing bloat, avoiding dependency hell.

    That said, probably there's some overlapping dependencies that, if installed in a different way I could save some space, but it's not worth it in my opinion.

    I'm also using rootless podman+systemd for certain services, but that's been a mixed bag compared with plain old docker or LXC.

    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    I thought the number one drawback to flatpaks is that they're enormous because each one includes all its own dependencies

    [–] jack@monero.town 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    No, same dependencies get deduplicated

    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

    Ah interesting. Good to know. Thank you

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›