225
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 79 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don't even trust that they will leave the servers up so people can play online so 40% off is still to high. Even 70%.

[-] TomAwsm@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Make it 90% and I'll start considering it.

[-] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 22 points 3 months ago

Make it 100% and I'll start considering it.

[-] maniel@lemmy.ml 64 points 3 months ago

Maybe I'm old but I'll never buy a live service game, I mean I don't like to play with people anyway, but there are multiple solo games with a bunch of MTX in the top of AAA price and they can shut down servers any time, and that's stupid

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I spent many years on World of Warcraft. I am a solo gamer too so it didn’t make much sense, but every now and then I’d bump into someone and we’d form a lasting memory.

I met a college professor 30 years older than me and we became very close friends entirely by accident. Hell, as silly as it is I had a very deep love for her.

She seen me jumping into a wall one evening (glitch in Stormwind) and she asked me what I was doing. I took her under the city and showed her my spot. I thought that was that, but a few nights later I was down there and she popped in and said, “I thought I might find you here.”

For months I did nothing but sit under Stormwind and talk to her. She was one of the most incredible people I had ever met. We came from completely different worlds. I was an uneducated, white, hillbilly junkie. She was a very educated black college professor and activist who was in a totally different place in her life.

In no other reality would we have connected like we did. She was legit my best friend in the whole world for a time. We went from text to ventrilo and in my mind, I don’t remember it as staring at a screen and talking through a microphone. I remember it like I was there. (Edit: I remember her actual face in my memories too, because we connected on social media and talked there as well. Crazy how memory works.)

That alone made the service game worth it haha.

We live in an interesting time. That’s for sure.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 58 points 3 months ago

It's amazing that a game with 2 unknown D tier characters on a 4 man roster is charging AAA prices for a live service game. No way that soulless cash grab is ever going to see 3 years old.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago

Big budget triple-A games don’t typically see such steep discounts so soon after launch,

Didn't this just happen with WB last Batman game that didn't have Batman in it?

Like just a year or so ago?

[-] CannonGoBoom@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago
[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

Got it for free. Didn't play it much.

Ignoring the high quality cinematics, the gameplay felt cheap. Especially since the blueprint they were following was a set of games from almost a decade ago that did it hundreds of times better.

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Same thing happened to D4 and starfield.

[-] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

Fallout 76 comes to mind

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

That one sucked and was a shallow game too.

Only thing it had going for it was the booty

[-] JCreazy@midwest.social 44 points 3 months ago

First the AAAA pirate game gets a price cut, then this.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago

Apprently the AAAA stood for "Ass All Actual Activities" as the game has basically nothing to do in it.

[-] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 43 points 3 months ago

If they're getting money through micro transactions they can charge absolutely precisely £0. I can't be bothered paying for a game that isn't complete.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 25 points 3 months ago

I'm also not paying for a game that might be unplayable in a few months due to lack of players.

[-] lorkano@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Nowadays it's $70 pricetag + paid battlepass + micro transactions + paid expansions. All this money yet every triple A game is getting shittier and shitter.

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 2 points 3 months ago

My rule of thumb is to avoid all F2Ps like the plague. If it's free, you are the product. I learned that lesson the hard way when I was younger, and the F2P market was still in its infancy.

[-] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

Cool, I may try in the future when Epic offers it for free.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

I said that about the new Saints Row. Then when it was free, I still didn't.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 3 months ago

I spent a few days with the free saints row and it was... Fine, but I didn't finish it. There's not much challenge or depth to the game, and the writing is just okay at best.

[-] PeroBasta@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

20 minutes on twitch showed immediately it was a soul-less game for me.

[-] Waldowal@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Here's what's great about "Live service". In the old days, they had to make the original game great to get your money. Then, if they wanted more of your money, they had to release "expansion packs" and make them similarly great to convince you to give them more money. With "Live Service", you're giving them your money ahead of time, for nothing, and they can decide what scraps of shit they give you in return - such as a single new character being added after months of payments. /s

[-] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago

Not enough of a discount to care

[-] metaStatic@kbin.social 18 points 3 months ago

literally couldn't pay me to play it

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I'd like to see them try, though...

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 14 points 3 months ago

Lethal company, Pacific Drive, Helldivers 2, balatro... so many good indie* games for $10 to $40 while these $70 games are burning in. All of them overwhelmingly positive too. Really makes you think about the games market and the ones who are actually taking risks and innovating.

*Helldivers isn't indie, but I also wouldn't describe them as AAA either.

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Helldivers studio is about 100 people, they're closer to indie than AAA.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
225 points (98.7% liked)

Games

15775 readers
643 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS