If they try pull 100 dollar bullshit or fill it with micro transactions then I am out. Also I will not pre order this game (I didn't with 5) I will wait until its out and I hear good things from the players.

Just like I did with 5. Had coworker who was bragging about the game every day. Finally and picked up a copy at Vintage Stock. This is the original PS3 version only one I have.

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Point 2 is the biggest for me. I haven’t played more than 30 minutes of gta5 online. Single player story is where it’s at. Wish we got more DLC.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Same only tried it once was no fun. Yes they game was built to have multiple DLCs or hell lot more story could of been told.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I only recently started playing again specifically because I found out that all the missions in online mode that required you to be in a public lobby are now able to be ran in a private lobby. Playing in a solo lobby is basically like getting more SP story (there are story missions in GTAO; it's not all races and DM). Don't have to deal with cheaters or asshats.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Does it work on PS3?

[–] hydration9806@lemmy.ml -4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Genuine question, why is $100 too much for a quality game? Completely agreed on the micro transactions though

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Hm.. how much is too much, then? If 70% higher than the industry standard isn't too nuch

[–] hydration9806@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Wow people really didn't like my question!

To respond to yours though, I'd say it depends on how much content there is! If a game can easily take 1000 hours with no degradation of enjoyment, I would pay $100 for it

Edit to add: I realize this didnt exactly address your question, but I'm not sure what percentage since it heavily depends on the quality and quantity of content

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

For me personally, I find it really easy to add "hours" to a game's runtime, and I'd sooner pay more for a higher quality experience and a shorter runtime. I've spent about a fifth of that 1000 mark in both Baldur's Gate 3 and Elden Ring, and they'd have been worth $100 to me. Indiana Jones was worth every bit of the $70 I paid, and it took me under 20 hours.

[–] accideath@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago

Exactly. $100 is a lot of money, however games are cheaper than ever these days (adjusted for inflation) and $100 for no micro transactions sounds fair.

On the other hand, I wouldn’t buy it at that price either. I‘d wait for a sale…