this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
957 points (95.5% liked)
Microblog Memes
6025 readers
1885 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This CEO, Gabe Newell, and (if he was still alive) the founder of Little Caesars, who, if I recall correctly, secretly paid for Rosa Parks apartment until her death.
The founder of Little Caesars was a typical magnate developer who bought up much of downtown Detroit and let it rot until he received tax incentives to build, and kicked out many low income residents from apartments he let sit until they got city money. His family continues this tradition. The Rosa Parks thing is the only good thing I've ever heard of that man and his family do.
Add Steve Wozniak to the list of the ones to be protected. The Woz has done more to pull people up and we should all aspire to that level if we ever have the means.
Woz isn't a CEO and was stabbed in the back so many times he makes the Ten of Swords look like a sign for future friendships
Woz is the true Tech Jesus
in terms of being betreayed? sure.
In terms of being the salvation and the light? Nah, that's Linus
Linus is the drunken uncle of the tech backbone, let's be real here. Woz is the supportive one after being in abusive relationship after abusive relationship.
After every instance of getting relatively screwed over (he still made bank, just not as much) he still founded and ran groups that focussed on pushing the envelope of tech or improving less advantaged youth into stem fields
Woz is Bill Dautrive, Linus is Rusty Shackleford :P
No that would be Stallman. In so many ways, but most importantly by establishing the concept of free software and pushing hard for progressive values. Also by being unpopular with the masses.
You mean GNU/Stallman
He's been on multiple board of directors and founded several orgs. While not a CEO, he's certainly in the same sphere and must be protected.
Gabe Newell owns fleets of yachts and private jets. The man is using your sweet gaming money to burn the planet.
Yeah but daddy gaben let's me play my games 😩 so it's okay
Yeah we need a source.
Also, as far as CEO's go, speaking from an outside perspective obviously, the man is wonderful. Valve makes solid business decisions in favor of long term growth instead of short term profits. They do this buy making sure that their platform is easy, safe, reliable, and not abusive for their consumers. They institute their own consumer protections into the platform that make them less money, just to make sure they remain a place we WANT to shop, when everyone else tries to make themselves the only place to shop, and then fucking over their consumers at every opportunity. Valve is a fucking case study on how companies should be ran, and a perfect display of how modern american capitalism is ruining everything, by being the antithesis of it.
source: https://www.superyachtfan.com/yacht/rocinante/owner/
maybe he's just buying up all the yachts and private jets so no one else can have them.
He was going to have them laser-scanned for a Half-Life 3 level, but nevermind.
Sources or STFU.
source: https://www.superyachtfan.com/yacht/rocinante/owner/
aww
Nah people need to stop jerking off Gabe and valve I general.
They started predatory lootboxes, ridiculously expensive cosmetics, early access, owning a licence instead of the actual game, had to be sued just to get refund policy and the vast vast majority of his wealth has come from just skimming a bit off from people who actually make games he distributes.
If you look at valve without the "omg steams sale XXXDDD"" mentality, then they are no better than ea or Activision.
Do you understand how much work goes into distributing terabytes of content around the world?
Valve give you AAA games. For free. No material restrictions on game-play or competitive advantage. They pay for the server hosting, anti-cheat and matchmaking.
The provide a storefront that anyone can sell their games on. And they don't contract you into exclusivity periods like others do. Do you think it's coincidence that they have, by far, the largest games store in the world?
They have supported games, for free, for over 10 years. You could have 10 years of world-class online gaming (CS:GO/2 or DOTA2) and have not spent a single penny, with no hit to your ability to play and win.
Sure, they're not perfect, they are at their core a profit-driven company and they can do things that are not in the consumers best interest.
But to compare them to shitbags like EA and Activision/Blizzard is an incredible thing to do. And removes any weight from your argument.
Virtual Casino. More addictive than IRL ones. Insidiously pushed on kids. Predatory. As Fuck.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMmNy11Mn7g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9aCwCKgkLo
I knew comments like this would turn up. But it still saddens me that even Lemmy users, who ar in general much more cognizant of these things and less likely to get caught up in the circlejerk, can't acknowledge that Gabe Newell isn't your best freind, he is in fact just another money hungry corporate CEO.
You say comparing valve to say, blizzard is incredible, but the points you use to defend valve can also be made of them.
Is Overwatch 2 not free? With no pay 2 win features? Does Blizzard not pay for the server hosting anti cheat and matchmaking? Do they not also support there game for years? ( also I find that funny given the fact the TF2 community is going ballistic right now over the fact valve isn't doing shit to support it against cheaters and bots)
Yes they provide a store front anyone can sell on. Including shitty asset flips, early access pump and dumps, predatory spyware etc. And are very reluctant to do litersly anything about it when those scams are called to attention.
And again, that storefront isn't some altruistic endeavour Gabe took on out the kindness of his heart. No he's made BILLIONS by exploiting the worl of others, just like every other billionaire. And if providing a basic service makes up for your predatory bullshit, well we might as well let literally every other CEO off the hook then right?
It's not a bad in to admit you got sucked in my propaganda or marketing or just general Internet circlejerks, what is a bad thing is to vehemently refuse any introspection on your current beliefs and defend them to the death simply because they are what you currently believe. I really hope I can reach out to people on Lemmy and that you guys can actually take a step and try to look at things objectively instead of doubling down.
I encourage you to point out where I did that. I think, you'll find, I agree with you, for the most part.
Yes, one of the two companies you listed have one free-to-play game. If you want to focus on that and ignore the decades of anti-consumer, money-grubbing behavior, I don't think I can help you.
Are you referring to Steam: Greenlight? Because, you know, they shut that down 8 years ago. Or, maybe you're referring to the mod marketplace they tried to start, and then shut down because of the backlash. That was 9 years ago.
Actually, Steam originated as an effort to block Microsoft's plans to turn PC gaming into a walled garden, like the consoles are. Sure, Valve make money off it, but there IS a consumer-friendly reason for it to exist.
Try this yourself.
Your post has an arrogance to it that smacks of "I'm always right, agree with me or be wrong.". I'm not saying it's intentional, but it comes across pretty strongly.
Also, don't pigeon-hole people who disagree you into GABEN4LYEF RIDE OR DIE fanatics, and we might just have a constructive conversation.
That's my point to you exactly. You're ignoring all of valves anti-consumer bullshit because they made a video game you like.
No, I'm just referring to the steam store itself, that just allows all that shit to this day.
So what's the "consumer friendly" reason they don't let you actually own your games?
I did. I used to be on the "omg Gaben so cool! Steam sale take my money you XD" circlejerk too. Then one day I heard about his fleet of luxury mega-yatchs and that made me look at things properly, that he was again just another billionaire leaching off the work of others.
I'm not. That's what you are doing to yourself by just completely disregarding decades of anti-consumer bullshit because they made a couple games you like.
You're just outright dismissing undeniable shitty behaviour from Valve for entirely superficial reasons, then when I show you you're justifications can be used with other gaming companies that get hate, you dismiss that without reason too.
You will probably consider this over dramatic but this interaction has 100% genuinely killed my last remaining scrap of hope for humanity. If people on Lemmy who are generally both left wing and intelligent, can't even acknowledge that billionaires that push anti-consumer bullshit are bad (even when they make a bideo game you like) then what hope is there of the general public understanding that? We're truly never going to change anything and we're just going to let the billionaires destroy us.
Thank you, goodnight.
Until you acknowledge that my position has nuance and is not diametrically opposed to yours, there is no reason to engage in debate.
You’ve repeatedly misrepresented my stance to make it an easy target for dismissal.
I asked you to point out where I made the claims you attributed to me, you did not.
I think you also need to give up the idea that everyone on a given platform will be as ‘enlightened’ as you are.
Everyone has their own thoughts and opinions. There is infinite room for microscopic differences. Straw-manning and pigeon-holing does nothing but annoy people and make you look boorish. Nobody wants to engage with that.
I will acknowledge that if and when you make a position with actual nuance. "You can't compare Valce to Activision because valve makes free games" isn't nuanced and is just ignorant.
???? No you didn't? I even just re read this whole thread. You literally never asked that????
Clearly.
Yep, some people have class consciousness and actually want to talk about the failures of capitalism and the atrocity of people having billions of dollars while others starve and live on the streets. And others want to defend those billionaires because they run a company that made a video game they liked 20 years ago.
Try the first line of my reply here: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/15461276
So let’s start with that and work our way from there.
Oh, that? I pointed that out in the next reply. But to reiterate.
You dismiss decades of anti consumer bullshit and exploration of workers because "valve give you AAA games for free"
Which, AGAIN(!!!), is something those other shitty companies do, but you don't dismiss their anti-consumer bullshit because of it. Which is pretty clear evidence you are caught up in the Valve circlejerk.
So since it's clear you don't give a shit about anything and just want to justify your own world view. And you dontn have the mental capacity or the humility to change your opinion, I'm done here, you can only waste more of my time and make me more depressed at the lack of awareness.
Truth.
Valve been private company allows them to avoid some shortsighted decisions of public corps, but they're no saints.
We need more stores, with an interstore protocol allowing you to move your licenses. EU get on that please
He also normalized hosting kid's content and adult/gambling content on the same platform. Anyone who tried to open up a game store that also sold adult material would get crucified nowadays.
The reason Steam is praised so much is because unlike EA and Activision, regardless of what they try to push that they shouldn't, they do put in the effort of going back and looking at issues from gamer's eyes. Those cosmetics? They came about at a time when P2W was much more of a concern, and paying for something merely visual was considered much more acceptable. Early access? It came about from trying to open up development to more indies instead of just the big devs and publishers. Licensing instead of owning? The alternative were much more costly physical copies that also degraded with time and which you had to maintain a backup of yourself. If your local game store didn't have it, you were screwed, and there could be no discounts. Porn on the platform? Don't care, not a child and I'm responsible.
Even then, I still damn Valve on both normalizing licenses on a subscription service that were it not for its market dominance could easily be teetering right now along with most people's game library's, and for not bothering to make an adult/gambling only version of a game store. GOG needs a competitor (remember Devotion and now Nine Sols), and it has none. It is possible to make money and be a digital distribution service without being a subscription service. There should be far more distance between adult and predatory content and normal gaming content, not all parents are responsible and it more easily creates communities predators can target from overlapping interests.
Making the claim that adult content = predators preying on children has a couple issues:
The debate over steam hosting adult content is some really regressive stuff. An alternative take, the one I hold, is "It's really heartening to see a major content platform not giving in to the conservative moralists that view anime tiddies as somehow damaging to the fabric of society. Making sexuality a less shameful topic for discussion also, conveniently, reduces 'shame' as an effective lever for preying on children, and makes them more likely to come forward and tell people when they're actually in danger".
All it takes is another client, a lot of argument for not wanting to take one iota of minimal responsibility. Predators are not rare, they literally fuel television series regarding them. They don't have to be many to be a threat, either, all it takes is a small number of very active ones. They do target children's game, having adult content facilities introducing children to it as "lol lemme gift u / giv u dis CD key its so sik". https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/07/us/video-games-child-sex-abuse.html - What alternate reality do you live in?
The first sentence of that article lists Minecraft and Fortnite.
Neither of those games are available on Steam.
...
So, and stop me if this is too wild a conclusion, it maybe just might possibly be the case that having separate storefronts doesn't actually have any impact on sexual predation of minors in videogames.
(Edit: actually, none of the games listed in that article are available on steam. Did... did you even read it?)
You were the completely utter moron who said predators "are incredibly rare", I was just disproving it. Now you are just moving the goalpost. Yeah, time to disconnect from pervs who are asking to handhold them through basic logic they don't want to see when all they will do is try to troll on whatever minutiae they think they can focus on to move the goalpost again.
That's not moving the goalpost, that's keeping the goalpost on the original topic. "Is steam making online predation worse by not having two separate storefronts" - Answer: Clearly, no, since there are multiple storefronts and that has nothing to do with how children are exploited online.
But if you want to talk about the rarity of predators (I'm taking the numbers in the article here): 1500 reported cases / year of sextortion in the US and nation partners is pretty damn rare. Even assuming non-reporting rates are 500x the value given in that article, that's still 750,000 victims among ~1,000,000,000 people, or a 0.00075% victim rate. You're only twice as likely to have been victimized per year as you are to have been struck by lightning. I don't... like, I don't know what else to call that but rare.
(The above numbers are just about sextortion, a very broad category of crime and that which is the crime in question here. Broadly, "pressuring kids online to send naked photos of themselves". This number doesn't include physical abuse crimes, I did confirm that in their sources.)
Fine, kick the kids off. It's better that way. Heaven forbid there be a place with both kinds of content. Imagine what would happen if bookstores or streaming services or years ago video rental places would do if they had all kinds of content. Oh and imagine that Steam had a filter to hide all that adult content wouldn't that just be absolutely crazy?
Not everything has to be safe for kids. Kick them the fuck out if it's an issue. Don't dumb down the adults experience.
Your analogy falls flat the moment your realize that G rated movies are served right beside R or unrated movies.
And steam has a filter to hide all adult content, and it also askes for your birthday all the damn time regardless of your account settings.
The first half of my comment was dripping sarcasm. I think the puritanical pearl clutching about steam having both types of content is stupid as fuck.
But what about the people who've got the maturity and responsibility of one, such as yourself?
Oh we will survive. Somehow! Thank you for your concern young knave but do not waste your fretting on us! Chin up!