this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
75 points (96.3% liked)

Canada

7273 readers
448 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As questions loom over Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s leadership, a new Nanos Research poll commissioned for CTV News says a quarter of Canadians say none of the potential Liberal leadership candidates appeal to them.

The survey offered people a selection of potential candidates to lead the party, including the current leader, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and a range of cabinet ministers and other high-profile Canadians. Of those polled, most selected “none of the above.”

The poll also found that among those surveyed, former Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney is the most appealing leadership candidate with 18 per cent support, followed by Trudeau and Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland who are tied at 11 per cent.

Carney is currently serving as the Liberal party’s economic advisor and has said he plans to enter elected politics but won’t say when or what job he wants.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Trudeau should continue. He knows how to handle Trump.

He's the only one I would trust to tell Trump to go fly a kite,

The same way Chretien did to Bush Jr and his bullshit.

The last thing Canada needs is to follow the US into the whole they're digging.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Bruh, have you seen the polling? PP as PM is a foregone conclusion, despite what I might want.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

And he's also going to tell Trump to fly a kite. They can go together and make a day of it. They'll laugh and bond and throw rocks at minorities. It'll be a grand occasion!

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's potentially a lot of time before the next election, and campaigns matter.

Things look bleak, but I don't think I'd call it a "foregone conclusion."

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aren't we due for an election in 2025?

Yeah, in October. That's nearly a year away.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm so afraid that the American apathy will spread to us here and we'll get a right wing government.

I've had to hold my nose and vote JT because the conservative party runs a nutjob or moron to go up against him, over and over. And jagmeet Singh just hides under a desk hoping the election passes him over.

I wish the NDP got a leader who actually wants to win

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ford got a majority government in Ontario with only 17% of the potential votes.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

When parties have unfavourable leaders who spend all their time quibbling nobody shows up to vote.

Everyone I know was saying Mike Schreiner was the only adult in the room but Green was a wasted vote, and all Doug had to do was say nothing to win.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Hot take - the NDP should only run candidates in ridings they're likely to win, and they should scream from the rooftops that voting for those candidates won't vote-split in favour of a con. The campaign money would go further, the probability of electing cons due to vote split drops significantly, they likely get more NDP MPs elected, the probability of a majority government decreases, hold higher power over a minority government. If it works, rinse and repeat, gaining more MPs every time.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem is that for years the NDP has swung further centrist instead of further left, giving us no true left party (except the Greens, who've been in damage control for years now).

Jack Layton did that in the hopes he could lead the NDP to a national win. Problem was he got sick and couldn't follow through ... so now we're left with nothing.

[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

The Greens are also full of crazy people, and very inconsistent from member to member. Greens run the gamut of "We need to stop climate change while also helping the poor", to "Vaccines are evil, you need to sun your yoni instead, and 9/11 was an inside job that also never happened".

Even if they can stop having negative headlines, they would need a constant platform and candidate vetting process to get my vote again.