this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
480 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

60106 readers
1857 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 203 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

From translating TFA:

Justice considers that the absence of moderation, cooperation with law enforcement and the tools offered by Telegram (disposable number, cryptocurrencies, etc.) makes it complicit in drug trafficking, child crime offenses and fraud.

Same reason Russia wanted to arrest him, failure to do the government's bidding.

[–] bfg9k@lemmy.world 111 points 4 months ago (4 children)

By that logic we should arrest all Car company CEOs for being complicit in crime lol, it's not exactly his choice what people do with his product

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 42 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Not really comparable because the illegal content is hosted and distributed through his servers. Which is why most sites are moderated to a degree. This dude basically said "fuck off" whenever takedowns were issued. It's hardly a surprise that he's been arrested.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 50 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Illegal content is distributed through snail mail and telephones too, but those are common carriers so they aren't liable. Why should Telegram be any different?

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 30 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The analogy works if you lease or rent.

Rent a car, commit a crime, boom — rental company is on the hook apparently. Moronic.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The rental company, on the other hand, is more than willing to turn you in to not be considered liable. Which they probably would be if they impeded an investigation.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Your modified analogy is broken, since it is impossible for an encryption service to provide the information being subpoenaed by definition. You wouldn’t claim Hertz is “impeding an investigation” by failing to use telepathy. Damn but authoritarians are stupid.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

So... you're saying your own analogy is disanalogous...

[–] strongarm@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

Most analogies are, its better to stick to facts

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But, have you noticed that after committing a crime, criminals and felons usually escape.... using a car?

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is more like arresting the getaway driver, not the car manufacturer.

[–] HarriPotero@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Except the getaway driver is just a cabbie who will drive anyone who gets in. He didn't know he was part of a heist.

Would you hold the CEO of lyft responsible if one of their self-driving cars were used in a heist?

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago

If the CEO of Lyft got repeated warnings that this very thing was happening and ignored them willfully, then yes. In the end he has nobody to blame but himself. It's no different from hosting a file sharing platform without ever vetting the content and wondering why the cops show up one day. The stupidity of going to France knowing that you're a wanted man in a number of countries is just the cherry on top.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Not sure. I was just bored and was making a funny comment.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Not really comparable because the illegal content is hosted and distributed through his servers.

landlords should be prosecuted for crimes commited by tenants in houses they rented out to the tenants.

[–] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 months ago

I mean depending on the crimes, yeah. If a child porn ring runs out of your building and you're alerted to its continued existence, and the police are asking who lives there and you don't tell them and keep renting to them? Yeah.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If the landlord knows it's happening and let it happen then yeah, that's what being complicit is all about

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

how are you meant to know, by impeding on your tenant's privacy constantly?

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Well, telegram has public and private conversations. So in this example, you'd know because they were having trafficking parties on their front yard and the police of multiple countries notified them to let them know. And then you were aware of this issue so you purposely avoided being in numerous countries that want to arrest you. Seems like he knew.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

People need houses to live. Taking stuff off your own server doesn't throw someone out onto the streets and leave them to the elements. Come on lol

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

The criminals ate bread before the heist, better round up all the grain farmers

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Next they'll charge oil executives for damage to the planet

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 33 points 4 months ago

Next they’ll make encrypting your own files illegal. Absolutely preposterous. Do better police work!

[–] MrSqueezles@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 4 months ago

Next up, outlawing pencil erasers and flammable paper

[–] Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So your pro arresting gun and ammo manufacturing company CEOs?

[–] gaael@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I'm all for it. Time to end the guns supply chain.

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Oh for fucks sake I'm so tired of this bullshit.

Governments nowadays are constantly acting like a tech platform has a responsibility eliminate privacy for users because if they have privacy, then they can't be tracked. It's infuriating.