213
submitted 3 days ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

President Joe Biden’s family used a Sunday gathering at Camp David to urge him to stay in the race and keep fighting despite his dreadful debate performance, and some members criticized how his staff prepared him for the faceoff, according to four people familiar with the discussions.

Biden spent the day sequestered with first lady Jill Biden, his children and grandchildren. It was a previously scheduled trip to the presidential retreat in Maryland for a photo shoot with Annie Leibovitz for the upcoming Democratic National Convention.

But the gathering was also an exercise in trying to figure out how to quell Democratic anxiety that has exploded following Thursday’s performance.

While his family was aware of how poorly he performed against Donald Trump, they also continue to think he’s the best person to beat the Republican presumptive nominee. They also believe he is capable of doing the job of president for another four years, according to the people who were not authorized to speak publicly about internal discussions and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

There is no other space filler. We need Biden to run! But we really need a candidate for next time.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Is anyone voting for Biden because they really love him?

He could be replaced at the snap of a finger and it would not cost votes.

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

As much as I don’t think Biden should run at his age, you’re basing the “changing the nominee now wouldn’t cost votes” on nothing whatsoever. There is a proven benefit to incumbency. I don’t like it, but it’s true. And the other massive question mark is who does a majority of the country like enough in the Democratic Party (that the Democratic Party actually wants being its nominee) to just install? Because you also have to factor in the mileage the right would get out of “the Democratic Party’s nominee was installed like a dictator!” shit. No to mention the optics of a party elite-chosen candidate. You can’t say a change wouldn’t lose votes without a definitive other candidate to compare to and without considering the optics.

So basically, what you’re saying is mostly just nonsense. This is a terrible situation for us to have to be I . But we’re in it. No use pretending.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

I am voting for Biden because he's a good president.

He could not be replaced at the snap of a finger, he's had an extremely active first term and already pursued and heavily invested in najor progressive reforms.

Unnecessarily replacing a candidate 4 months before the election would absolutely throw the election to the conservatives.

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

the country is less progressive now then when Biden was in office with Obama

on that note US citizens enjoy less rights than their counterparts living in the 60s

fucking sad Americans are willingly ready to suck Biden or Trump depending on your favorite color

all voters could just protest by voting someone else if the top two choices suck but hey the democrats wouldn't like that because that would be a vote for Trump

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 days ago

I see and hear a more progressive population inundated with more conservative news.

Totally agree about voting.

[-] timewarp@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago

Not it wouldn't. A different candidate results in much higher odds of beating Trump. Do you actually want to beat Trump? Biden has done some good things but he will not be remembered for that if his elder abusing family gets their way.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

That is absurd.

Biden led a good first term with many solid beneficial policies, let him lead a second good term.

You are high as a kite if you think replacing a known candidate with solid support 4 months before an election is a good election strategy.

It's a terrible idea and puts the Democrats at a significant disadvantage showing political instability, poor decision making and confusing builders.

It's a terrible idea to unnecessarily replace a good president.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 days ago

You'll find some in the politics comms who love Biden

[-] timewarp@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago

Yeah, maybe those that love genocide.

[-] xhieron@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago

Hi, comrade! I love Joe Biden and I hate genocide, so there.

[-] Llewellyn@lemm.ee 0 points 3 days ago

Come on! He's just a speaking head!

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago

If there is a next time

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
213 points (90.5% liked)

News

21706 readers
4462 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS