this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
1074 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

58092 readers
4430 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As the AI market continues to balloon, experts are warning that its VC-driven rise is eerily similar to that of the dot com bubble.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 321 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Just a reminder that the dot com bubble was a problem for investors, not the underlying technology that continued to change the entire world.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 195 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's true, but investors have a habit of making their problems everyone else's problems.

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not that you're wrong per-se but the dotcom bubble didn't impact my life at all back in the day. It was on the news and that was it. I think this will be the same. A bunch of investors will lose their investments, maybe some adventurous pension plans will suffer a bit, but on the whole life will go on.

The impact of AI itself will be much further reaching. We better force the companies that do survive to share the wealth otherwise we're in for a tough time. But that won't have anything to do with a bursting investment bubble.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lots of everyday normal people lost their jobs due to the bubble. Saying it only impacted the already rich investors is wrong.

[–] ZagTheRaccoon@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There really isn't much that can harm rich people that won't indirectly do splash damage on other people, just because their actions control so much of the economy that people depend on for survival.

[–] kitonthenet@kbin.social 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The dotcom bubble was one of the middle dominos on the way to the 2008 collapse, the fed dropped interest rates to near zero and kept them there for years, investor confidence was low, so here come mortgage backed securities.

In addition, the bubble bursting and its aftermath is what allowed the big players in tech (Amazon, Google, Cisco etc) to merge to monopoly, which hasn’t been particularly good

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good for you. But perhaps fuck off, because some of us lost jobs, homes, and financial stability.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some of you is not most of Americans.

[–] JustSomePerson@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you considered accepting that you're wrong on this? It's not a personal disaster to realize that just because you didn't personally see the impact, there was none. Instead of sticking to what you thought, you might learn insights. Perhaps they can be valuable when analyzing the current bubbles.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah I'm m always right. Your mom says so.

Yeah. Note how we're having this conversation over the web. The bubble didn't hurt the tech.

This is something to worry about it you're an investor or if you're making big career decisions.

If you have a managed investment account, like a 401(k), it might be worth taking a closer look at it. There's no shortage of shysters in finance.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

In Canada, a good example is cannabis industry. Talk about fucking up opportunities.

Why would it be any different with tech?

It’s about the early cash-grab, imo.