randomsnark

joined 1 year ago
[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, I suspect it's a jerboa problem. I've posted about it on the jerboa community now.

Edit: Confirmed. Jerboa's source code uses a plugin to force all links to be opened as https.

[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

under what circumstances have you peeled a lemon

[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Super late, but I figured it out because it happened again in a more recent comment. Lemmy seems to automatically change the links to https instead of http, even when http was explicitly included in the url. Somehow, xkcdsw is a completely different site on https than on http. If you copy the link into an external browser and remove the s, the link works as intended. I can only assume this is a behavior of the lemmy app(s), which is why it didn't affect some users. Were you using jerboa?

[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Relevant xkcdsw (the first link in the comment): https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/2wx9ws/today_i_discovered_xkcdsw/covb60y/

Now, why the hell would I link to a reddit comment instead of directly to the comic? Because for some reason, xkcdsw links on lemmy turn into links to a dodgy crypto site: http://xkcdsw.com/687

No idea why this happens - I remember this happening a few months back and I assumed that somehow xkcdsw had gotten hacked in between me fetching the link and other people replying, but just now I discovered that it works fine as long as you're not following the link from my lemmy comment. Also, judging by replies the last time it happened, the direct link from lemmy does still work for some people. I assumed those people on the previous thread got in before the site got hacked, but now I wonder if it's instance-specific. Is my instance just redirecting certain links to a crypto site for some reason? Or my app (jerboa)?

For those not seeing the redirect, the address bar claims it's still xkcdsw, but the content appears to be from dogecoinaverage

The actual xkcdsw is just a shitpost, barely worth the two words and one link in my original comment, but the redirect is weird.

Edit: the fact that the link in the reddit comment works even via jerboa's internal browser makes me think it's the instance.

Edit 2: previous occurrence of this: https://lemmy.ml/comment/5379893 - it doesn't seem to be instance-based, as someone on Feddit.de saw the redirect, but someone else on my instance did not

Edit 3: mystery solved(ish) - lemmy is silently changing the http to https (for some reason), which results in a different site (for some reason). I've alerted the xkcdsw owner to the problem via mastodon.

Edit 4: this is gonna look really confusing now that two9a has fixed the xkcdsw https situation. Like "what is this comment even talking about?" Trust me, it made sense up until about 10 minutes ago. Oh, also I confirmed that jerboa is the what changes all http links to https.

[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

You need to prompt your party to roleplay as non-idiots and think through their solution step-by-step. Of course, it's possible your party is also running an outdated model.

[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 month ago

they probably fell into an empty enclosure one day and the zookeepers just rolled with it and put up a sign

[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Are capybaras as chill as their reputation suggests, or is that more a feature of cases that are used to captivity? If the memes/images/videos are to be believed, I'd expect to be able to just wander up to one in the wild and have it respond like a well-socialized pet dog.

[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

I see a lot of cages there - is Scootaloo your only pet that can't fly?

[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

I think the modern pushback comes from people who get their understanding of technology from science fiction. SF has always (mis)used AI to mean sapient computers.

[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

"Inconvenience" would be the verb for causing an inconvenience. So in the sentence you're going for, "inconvene" would have to be replaced with the passive "be inconvenienced" ("we've gotta be inconvenienced and grovel to google a bit"). I don't believe we have a separate word for "endure an inconvenience", although it seems like the kind of thing some languages might have a single word for. Stylistically I'd probably restructure the sentence to "we've gotta put up with the inconvenience" rather than just using the passive verb, but yeah.

I think you'd most often see this verb in the stock phrase "Sorry to inconvenience you".

[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

me too, thanks

view more: next ›