this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
857 points (98.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

4840 readers
1820 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Bonus question: would this make a new continent?

[–] Gladaed@feddit.de 11 points 1 month ago

No, it would not. There already are waterways splitting North America into multiple large pieces.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nope, the continental plate would not be separated by a river flowing over top.

[–] onion@feddit.de 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Continents are not defined by tectonic plates, for example Eurasia is separated by an imaginary line. There is no universally agreed upon definition of what exactly earths continents are either.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.de 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then you'd need to dig really, really deep. Even deeper than where the Balrog lives.

[–] moriquende@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

as long as you don't do it greedily you should be fine

[–] constantokra@lemmy.one 1 points 1 month ago

This is the United States we're talking about.

[–] RedCarCastle@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Would the north and south go to war again for control?

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

we're already on the edge of civil war over clumps of undifferentiated cells and pronouns. absolutely yes

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, but not for slavery this time, but for fresh water in the decades ahead of climate change. Those freshwater Great Lakes will be awfully attractive 100 years from now.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The south doesn’t believe in climate change so they won’t mind right, right?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We'd have to change all the names!

Canada's pants become Canada shorts and Canada socks