this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
179 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37525 readers
306 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brisk@aussie.zone 23 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Will we ever stop referring to the Web as "the Internet"?

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

To be fair, the definition is a bit muddier nowadays. Is Lemmy on the Web? I don't use it via the website. Bulletin boards used to not be part of the Web, as they pre-date the Web. But nowadays everything is HTTP. There's so little non-web left, and the vast majority of users never use it, that the Internet is only used for accessing the Web.

[–] Laser@feddit.de 5 points 5 months ago

BitTorrent is a pretty big part of the Internet though.

[–] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But it's not muddy though. The Internet is the infrastructure that the web runs across. And there are still plenty of other protocols out there beside the web that are in use every single day. Even if the average user were to primarily use the Internet for accessing the web, it doesn't mean the definitions of the two have become muddy. Interstate 4 is not Walt Disney World, even if you only ever drive I-4 to get to Disney.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago

The thing is: what people call the Internet is not the infrastructure. It's the content on the Internet. There's the technical term "Internet" and there's the coloquial term. Unfortunately, engineers and scientists suck at naming and explaining things at the level that the general population can understand. So "the Internet" became synonymous with "content on the Internet", be it Web content, torrents, bbs and what not.

[–] kniescherz@feddit.de 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Not sure if a serious question. So forgive me if your question was meant to be a statement.

The internet is a large set of computers connected via a set of protocols: IP and on top of that TCP, UDP or very occasionally SCTP (more common on mobile networks).

There’s 65000-ish ports (channels) available on the internet (IP network).

The web runs on port 80 and 443 via TCP (mostly).

The internet supports all sorts of other traffic/channels too: Time synchronisation, games, file transfer, e-mail, remote login, remote desktops etc. None of these run on the web, but is traffic that runs in parallel to the web, using either TCP or UDP protocols.

The distinction is getting blurrier as lots of traffic that used to be assigned (or simple chose) its own port number is now encapsulated in HTTP(s) traffic. But the distinction is definitely not gone.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The advent of REST API endpoints really muddies everything up when all requests are going over the web.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yes agreed. I suspect it will collapse to “non-time-critical traffic will run on HTTPS via REST” and “everything else will run on UDP, using their own ports”, except for maybe a couple of golden oldies like NTP, FTP, SMTP/POP/IMAP.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

POP and IMAP are pretty much dead at this point. Email is basically dead at this point. Want to spin up a machine and have it email you system messages? Nope. Want to run a Python script that sends to gmail? lol. https://mailtrap.io/blog/gmail-smtp/

On all my microservers I have pretty much have 22, 80, and 443 open. I try to interact exclusively over web ports for as much as possible.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 2 points 5 months ago

It’s hard, but not impossible, to get a personal mail server trusted amongst the big players, agreed.

That doesn’t mean email can’t be accessed with IMAP (or heaven forbid, POP3) on the big players. Outlook, gmail, FastMail, proton etc all support it.

[–] kniescherz@feddit.de 6 points 5 months ago

Totally serious. Never knew there is a difference. Thanks for the explanation.

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 2 points 5 months ago

Appreciate this, I thought they were both called "the internet". I knew we called it the worldwide web when I was a kid, but I thought that was just a phrase that fell out of fashion.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Where does Lemmy fall on this spectrum? Obviously the website part is 100% web, but I’m accessing Lemmy through a mobile app, so I don’t see any website here.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 2 points 5 months ago

Well this is what I mean. In the olden days, this would be custom traffic on a custom port. Nowadays it just uses web HTTPS REST calls as API.

[–] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 2 points 5 months ago

Think of the Internet as the US Interstate Highway system. The web is a chain of tourist attractions you can visit along those roads.

The Internet is the physical and logical collection of interconnected networks. The web is a protocol that runs on top of that infrastructure, just as email, ssh, ftp, irc, etc. do.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 5 months ago

Given there's people in this thread incorrectly using "internet" instead of "web"... Probably never.