this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
787 points (96.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27207 readers
3599 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Resol@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And if you're 18, you can only date someone who is exactly 18. Can't go any lower or any higher.

Idk who told this to me, but what a weird contradiction. I guess it sorta makes sense.

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Nope. If your age minimum for a partner y is determined by your age x with the function:

y = 1/2 x + 7

then the point where y = x is at y - 7 = 1/2 x. Setting y to x leads us to x - 7 = x / 2, which happens at x = 14.

At x = 18, y = 18/2 + 7 = 9 + 7 = 16.

Relatedly, if we invert the function, y - 7 = 1/2 x, thus 2y - 14 = x, which gives us the theoretical maximum for a possible partner. If a possible partner is older than that, you'd be understood to call them a cougar, or whatever the male equivalent is.

[–] Puffymumpkins@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

My favorite feature of the x/2+7 rule is that it implies you shouldn't be dating below the age of 14. Run any number lower than 14 through it to see what I mean. You can't reasonably say a 6 year old should only date people older than 10 and also younger than -2.

[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Don't you hate it when your 6 year old starts dating those people from the negative mirrorworld? No child of mine I say!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

When your six year old starts dating people's tentative plans to have a child

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

And a newborn should be dating nobody younger than seven, while also dating nobody older than yet to be born in 14 years 😛

[–] dos_user@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah 14 is fine. 6 year olds shouldn't be dating anyone anyway

[–] Risk@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

But she wanted to borrow my truck???

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

How might this apply to calculator relationships?

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

whatever the male equivalent is

Dirty Old Man

Daddy

Lothario

Creep

Giuliani

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I guess this makes more sense.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I believe now if you are 18 you need to consult with a lawyer before dating.

[–] Hangglide@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope my kids don't go to the same school that you did.

[–] edward@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The rule is min: age/2+7, max: age*2-7, 36 -> min: 25, max: 65. 18 -> min 16, max 29.

[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The opposite of age/2+7 is (age-7)*2, not age*2-7. I.E. the min age for a 29-year-old would be 21, not 18, and the age whose min is 18, I.E. the max for an 18-year-old, would be 22.

[–] Amilo1591@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Max dating age limit for 18yo is 22? That doesn't sound right at all.

[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

"Kids fresh out of high school should not be dating adults that have graduated college" sounds roughly right to me.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Seems fine. It would raise some eye brows but it's literally the max acceptable.

[–] Puffymumpkins@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You got the order of operations backwards for the max age. It's (x-7)/2

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That max age formula is pointless and contradicts the minimum age formula. For 29 the min age based on the min age equation is 21.5 which I'd say can be rounded up to 22, which sounds more reasonable than a 29 year old dating an 18 year old, which isn't illegal sure, but I'm sure plenty of people would be raising an eyebrow at it.

That max age equation would mean that a max age for 14 would be 21. In contrast the min age for a 21 year old is 17.5, which can be rounded up to 18. Yymv on that one in particular, but I'm sure we can all agree that a 21 year old dating an 18 year old is a lot less sus than them dating a 14 year old. The minimum age formula seems fine enough on its own, not necessarily a universal rule but enough of a guideline to go by generally. If you want to calculate based on the younger age, just re-arrange the formula. With the older age being AgeO and the younger age being ageY, you go from ageY = (AgeO/2) + 7 to AgeO = (ageY - 7)*2.

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

The max age formula is pointless and contradicts the minimum age formula. For 29 the min age based on the min age equation is 21.5 which I'd say can be rounded up to 22, which sounds more reasonable than a 29 year old dating an 18 year old, which isn't illegal sure, but I'm sure plenty of people would be raising an eyebrow at it.

That max age equation would mean that a max age for 14 would be 21. In contrast the min age for a 21 year old is 17.5, which can be rounded up to 18. Yymv on that one in particular, but I'm sure we can all agree that a 21 year old dating an 18 year old is a lot less sus than them dating a 14 year old. The minimum age formula seems fine enough on its own, not necessarily a universal rule but enough of a guideline to go by.