83
submitted 11 months ago by seasonone@opidea.xyz to c/technology@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NaoPb@beehaw.org 36 points 11 months ago

But they do fuel polarization in general. I'm sure of it.

[-] bownage@beehaw.org 50 points 11 months ago

Actually one of the conclusions from both the Science and Nature articles were that they mostly fuel far right radicalisation, not so much polarisation (which implies both ends of the political spectrum). Which I guess means leftists are generally either more capable of spotting misinformation or less inclined to act on it.

[-] PostmodernPythia@beehaw.org 23 points 11 months ago

Also, there’s not a large, well-funded far-left movement in the US fighting to radicalize people.

[-] Erk@cdda.social 10 points 11 months ago

All I've got to offer are unionisation pamphlets and a brick.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 17 points 11 months ago

Which I guess means leftists are generally either more capable of spotting misinformation or less inclined to act on it.

Or are less likely to be on Facebook in general.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 7 points 11 months ago

The studies were percentage based, so yes, volume of posts could play an active role but likely more from an "activity" amount vs "presence".

[-] kingthrillgore@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

So this confirms all the studies and adages of conservative voters being less intelligent, more subject to scams and fraud, and less accepting of social norms.

[-] whelmer@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

You've got studies suggesting that conservatives are less accepting of social norms?

[-] nzodd@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

Does not literally turning traitor and attempting to overthrow the United States of America and murder the vice president count as a social norm?

[-] whelmer@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Bit of a non-sequitor, that would be an anecdote and not a study. But yeah I would say that those things would violate social norms. I don't know if I would agree that conservative people are more likely to violate those norms, which is presumably your point. Take a look at the history of political assassinations in the United States or in Europe, for example. Political violence does not belong uniquely to conservatives.

I think actually pretty much by definition that conservatives are MORE concerned with social norms. That's kind of one of the primary traits of conservativism. I think a pretty good argument could be made that the Tumpist people you're referring to do not so much represent a conservative point of view as much as a fascist or ultra-nationalist one, which explains why they will violate certain norms pertaining to peaceful electoral processes, while strongly maintaining other norms, like heterosexual nuclear families or religious observances or certain expectations of gender expression, etc.

[-] inconel@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

If it only drives the far-right, does that mean Facebook contributed shifting in window of discourse? (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window)

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 11 months ago

Not radicalization, just polarization, they are different. But overall, yes.

load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
83 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37208 readers
119 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS