681
submitted 5 months ago by JoMiran@lemmy.ml to c/news@lemmy.world

TL;DR: Americans now need to make $120K a year to afford a typical middle-class life and qualify to purchase a home. Minimum.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 56 points 5 months ago

https://www.rd.usda.gov/sites/default/files/fact-sheet/508_RD_FS_RHS_SFH502Direct.pdf

the federal government will loan you the money for the house at below market rates, and if their rate is still too expensive, they can give you a deferment.

my effective interest rate today is 1%.

please take money from the federal government.

fuck the banks.

[-] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 5 months ago

Lots of sellers will prefer cash or regular loans so your application is very likely to be last in line. Plus the applications are much, much more complicated and mortgage applications are already a bitch. But then it's usually a once in a lifetime experience and may be the only option for a lot of people do this is more of a heads up than an attempt to discourage anyone from applying.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

we lost 4 bids and saw almost 2 dozen houses before finding a winner

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

Cash I understand, but what's the reasoning behind sellers preferring regular loans instead?

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

USDA isn't gonna buy a fixer upper. they want people to have safe housing. this might mean the seller is going to need to fix the problems

for us, we liked that, but it did mean we lost our on a couple bids. which was good: we found a real jewel.

[-] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 5 months ago

In a hot market/location this will never happen. Even with a regular loan there's a bidding war on houses with obvious issues.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

i live in a hot market. i got one. it was a slog, but it happened.

edit: we were approved in november. we put in multiple offers and had to periodically get re-approved by the usda, but we had an offer accepted mid march and closed in april.

for a brief period, we kept the "apartment in the city" for a month and moved one sub-compact car worth of belongings across town every night. not really relevant, but i'm going to remember fondly the brief time that we kept an apartment in the city, because that shit is never gonna happen again for poor schlubs like us.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, sellers (flippers really) are asking 70-80k over the value of the house, and they want no-inspection, as is, and you need to bring cash to the closing to cover appraisal gap, which is usually in the 60-100k range.

We need to start taxing unoccupied single-family home at their list price. There is no incentive to sell at a reasonable price.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah, sellers (flippers really) are asking 70-80k over the value of the house, and they want no-inspection, as is, and you need to bring cash to the closing to cover appraisal gap, which is usually in the 60-100k range.

I haven't been in the market for nearly a decade. This seems pants-on-head crazy to me.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

All I can hope for is that when the market inevitably collapses again (let's face it, this is not sustainable) all these assholes hit rock bottom and the government FINES them instead of bailing them out.

[-] nymwit@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Isn't what's been happening that corporations buy them for cash they have on hand and now they're all rentals? It'd have to crash pretty hard to push those guys out I think. [pure speculation by me]

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Oh ok makes sense.

[-] Pulptastic@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

This. The inspection and repair criteria are higher than for private lending. We sold our house to someone using this program and had to fix stuff that we didn't need fixed when we bought the house. It wasn't a huge deal but it did add a week to the process to get it fixed and reinspected.

[-] yum_burnt_toast@reddthat.com 12 points 5 months ago

"applicants must be without decent, safe, and sanitary housing" is that a hard stop or is there some flexibility on that condition? im not trying to pry into your previous situation, but that makes it sound a bit more dire than the average renter.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

i had a lease on an apartment when the process started.

edit: honestly if the requirement were that you were homeless or next to it,i don't think anyone would ever apply for this program. the first application is daunting, and then there is the matter of actually shopping for a house.

[-] yum_burnt_toast@reddthat.com 2 points 5 months ago

ah, good to know. thanks for the tip!

[-] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Saved bro i need to marry a real welfare qween

[-] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Humans can't marry corporations.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

fair warning: my application packet was around 100 pages

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Why tho, republicans are fucking horrible people.

this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
681 points (96.5% liked)

News

21693 readers
4232 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS