161
submitted 11 months ago by Wahots@pawb.social to c/technology@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

Why was it ever allowed for companies to make unilateral contracts with no representation or limits? The entire ecosystem of digital platforms is full of absolutely ridiculous terms and agreements.

Not only there is no reason why digital media shouldn't be treated as a regular purchase, they want it both ways. Digital storefronts don't say "license" or "rent". They say "Buy", because they know people want to buy it, and many of them wouldn't pay if they couldn't buy it. It's downright deceptive that they label the transaction as a purchase then put a wall of legalese on some corner saying "actually 'buy' does not mean buy".

[-] andrai@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

That's the funny part, they aren't allowed to. But they know no one is gonna bother to sue then over it.

Those ridiculous terms of service are null and void when challenged in court.

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
161 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37208 readers
224 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS