this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
559 points (94.9% liked)

Lemmy NSFW

11999 readers
3 users here now

Updates about lemmynsfw.com

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One of the admins at lemmy.blahaj.zone asked us to purge a community and all of its users because they thought it was full of child sexual abuse material, aka CSAM, fka kiddy porn. We assured them that we had checked this comm thoroughly and we were satisfied that all of the models on it were of age.

The admin then demanded we purge the comm because they mistook it for CSAM, and claimed that the entire point of the community was to make people think it was CSAM. We vehemently disagreed that that was in fact the point of the community, but they decided to defederate from us anyway. That is of course their choice, but we will not purge our communities or users because someone else makes a mistake of fact, and then lays the responsibility for their mistake at our feet.

If someone made a community intended to fool people into thinking it was kiddy porn, that would be a real problem. If someone of age goes online and pretends -- not roleplays, but pretends with intent to deceive -- to be a child and makes porn, that is a real problem. Nobody here is doing that.

One of the reasons we run our instance the way that we do is that we want it to be inclusive. We don't body shame, and we believe that all adults have a right to sexual expression. That means no adult on our instance is too thin, fat, bald, masculine, old, young, cis, gay, etc., to be sexy, and that includes adults that look younger than some people think they should. Everyone has a right to lust and to be lusted after. There's no way to draw a line that says "you can't like adult people that look like X" without crossing a line that we will not cross.

EDIT: OK, closing this post to new comments. Everything that needs saying has been said. Link to my convo with the blahaj admin here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nsfwTA@lemmynsfw.com 43 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I’ve seen both of these posts now, and it leads me to wonder what is the community? because this sounds like the same situation as the jailbait subreddit a long time ago, and if it’s literally a jailbait community then i’d have to agree with their decision to defederate. hosting jailbait porn is gross, equating that position to bodyshaming is insane.

[–] MikeyMongol@lemmynsfw.com 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Jailbait is by definition people that are under legal age, or at least pretending to be. If someone is of legal age they by definition cannot be jailbait. The appeal there is the violation of the statutory taboo, the allure of the forbidden fruit. That is not OK and we won't tolerate that.

If a grownup has a round face and is wearing braces, which is the post that I suspect launched this whole kerfluffle, that's just how they look. I'm not going to tell them that they can't be sexy, or you that you can't be into them being sexy, because of their face or their dental work. Now, you can see why someone might be concerned that someone that has braces might be underage, since many people that are underage have braces. But once we've confirmed that they aren't underage, that should be the end of it.

[–] Jobesmith92@lemmynsfw.com 25 points 1 year ago

The dude obviously has never seen /r/braceface

[–] awweaver@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

...was this one of the communitiew I made...wow

to be clear I am talking about !cutieswithbraces@lemmynsfw.com

[–] Shit@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

It's the one named braces here I think. !adorableporn@lemmynsfw.com

[–] Shit@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was it just that one post that caused all this? Honestly I was expecting something way worse not like a single post in a fairly active looking community...

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They decided that because they mistook it for CSAM it should be taken down, and the entire community with it.

Because they assumed one image was CSAM.

It’s kinda nuts.

[–] anaisrim@mastodon.social 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@KairuByte @Shit

After reading Ada's post and comments there (not removed, many were), it's my opinion the admins there wanted to defederate lemmynsfw anyway and this was a convenient excuse.

Regardless, it's their server. Many users there support the decision. Their right, and if the userbase wants that they've chosen the right instance for them. Those who don't want that outcome will move.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m inclined to agree with you. Though I’ll argue that most users over there are agreeing based on a colorful interpretation of what happened, assuming that there is indeed a community based around legal porn meant to look like CSAM… which doesn’t appear to be the case at all. Look at the community in question (!adorableporn@lemmynsfw.com) and you’ll notice a lack of anything encouraging people to present as underage.

[–] twelves@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 1 year ago

Adults can be, and often are, adorable.

[–] anaisrim@mastodon.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@KairuByte

I've seen it. IMO the side panel explicitly says "childlike" and I can see some might have a problem with that. It suggests the purpose Ada objected to over there. And I think mods and admins might want to change that text such that it makes no reference to underage anyone in the context of porn.

Clearly, all participants are over 18. Good.

[–] b9999998@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm the new mod of a few hours at !adorableporn@lemmynsfw.com , and i have nothing to hide.

See pinned post https://lemmynsfw.com/post/419923 and comments as I was trying to update the community sidebar from a single line to what you see there now, and get feedback. I even have a "under construction" disclaimer.

Btw, the reference came as I was cut/paste from here https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/adorable

[–] twelves@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Did they change it? I don't see what you're saying is there.

[–] Asslaion@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 year ago

Just went there, the sticky post has a comment suggesting they remove it and the moderator said they removed the phrase. That one was actually something problematic to leave there. Apparently they are changing rules and there's new mods or something

[–] anaisrim@mastodon.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@twelves

There's a screenshot I included. Posted from Mastodon so maybe the image didn't propagate out to lemmy?

[–] AnaisRim@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 year ago

Coming here from Lemmynsfw and I see my screenshot did not propagate. It's ok. I'm sure ActivityPub devs will get the unified timeline down sometime. When will everyone switch to Zot?

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I understand the knee jerk reaction... Doesn't federation mean they are potentially possessing copies of that content, hosting it, by being federated?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

So, yes. Their instance would have copies of content viewed by their users. That said, they didn’t defederate because of CSAM, which would make perfect sense. They defederated because they made an incorrect assumption, and then wanted an entire community nuked because of that assumption… even after they were corrected.

The moment things were made clear, they should have said “oh okay, our bad.” But instead they doubled down.

[–] assqrw@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 year ago

Doesn't federation mean they are potentially possessing copies of that content, hosting it, by being federated?

Media isn't replicated. Lemmy is a link aggregator, posts include links to content and that is what is replicated. The fact that instances let you upload images directly does make that a bit confusing but if you look at a post from one instance on another the posts link is still the image on the original instance and is fetched from there. The only local media from federated instances are the thumbnails that are generated and stored locally. That's still a problem in the instance of some illegal content but less so.

[–] NorinTheRad@lemmynsfw.com 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure that's equivalent comparison. I'm not sure of the community either, but my understanding is that everyone involved is an adult.

R/jailbait was hosting sexualized content of literal children.

This is closer to blocking a community because you feel that the models under the "teen" category look too young, even though they are all technically adults.

[–] MikeyMongol@lemmynsfw.com 51 points 1 year ago

Yeah that's about the size of it.

[–] Bendavisunlv6@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 1 year ago

I had this question too. It was adorableporn. It is not remotely comparable to r/jailbait so let’s not jump to conclusions. The lemmynsfw mods are absolutely in the right here.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If it’s the one I saw yes it is jailbait, but curated to only contain adults who just happen to appear underage. I for one think it’s incredibly fucked up, but I’m not on this instance