this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
981 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

25122 readers
3673 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackRiddle@sh.itjust.works 34 points 6 months ago (3 children)

"People are addicted" and "actively choose it" are contradictory statements. Addiction is a disease, not a personal failing.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

I'd only refute the "active"part.

You physically choose to locomote towards the counter to make the purchase, you physically choose to lift the cup to your mouth.

The problem is your own mind is working against you to make that physical choice seem absolutely mandatory, via the importance of chemical signaling

[–] gears@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

They still are choosing sugar?

I'm addicted to nicotine and I actively choose to hit my vape, for example.

[–] moriquende@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Agree it's a disease, but it's also a choice. You choose to buy a big gulp when you crave it.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's like saying losing chess against a grandmaster is a choice because you pick where the pieces go.

[–] moriquende@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How is choosing to buy a sugared drink instead of water the same as playing a game of chess against a grandmaster? What exactly about it makes your analogy fit?

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Here's a few ways:

Information: does an individual know chess rules? Openings? En passant? Do they want to spend the time and effort to learn? Are they getting their info from reliable sources or are they learning bongcloud and knooks?

Difference in skill level: the food and diet industries have thousands of specialists on their side with experience in psychology, advertisement, economics, lobbying, etc. Grandmasters can set up traps that new like a good idea to their opponent while thinking 10 steps ahead.

Complexity: chess and diet are not a single choice, but a series of choices, some of which make later moves more difficult.

Effort: it takes a long time to learn enough to even put up a decent resistance to a grandmaster, let alone win. It's more than I'd care to put in. I don't want to think about chess all the time. That's called a chessing disorder.

[–] moriquende@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So your point is that it's difficult to resist the urge to buy sugared drinks due to distinct factors such as lack of information about it being unhealthy (which I seriously doubt nowadays) and people being psychologically manipulated through advertisements and making their product economically competitive. I agree some of these factors make it easier to be unhealthy, but I disagree that it's enough to say people don't have and make a choice. The choice to be healthy is just a harder one to make than it should.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're straw manning me. I'm not saying people don't have a choice. But they're still going to lose. It doesn't matter that I have a choice of which piece to move when the point is not to move pieces, but to checkmate. Saying there are choices misses the point.

[–] moriquende@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No it doesn't because you're arguing as if choices were dependant on one another. Choosing to avoid a coke one time doesn't mean you're now in a bad position to avoid another coke later on. It's not about winning or losing it's about building habits and keeping them, which I have agreed is made hard in some people's environment.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So one choice doesn't impact another unless it's to make a habit? Come on, you can't have a rule apply to my point but not to your point.

[–] moriquende@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The point I'm making is that a game of chess has a conclusion, a destiny if you will, in which you'll lose even if you make a good choice right now. Real life is not like that, your choice to be healthy now does not mean you've lost the opportunity to do so in the future, ultimately leading you to your "destiny" of being unhealthy. That is victim mentality and we shouldn't endorse it. Still, I completely agree that making the unhealthy choice has become easier in recent times, and we should strive to reverse that trend.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh, sorry, I didn't know that's what real life was like. Thanks for setting me straight.

But yeah, being talked down the like that means I'm done with you. Try to be less condescending when you disagree with people.

[–] moriquende@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I don't believe I talked you down or stayed from a respectful tone, but if I made you feel like that I just want to say it was not my intention. In any case, have a good one!