this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
240 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22057 readers
142 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 95 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The travesty is how many people are unable to say this out loud. Everyone is stuck in their black & white tribalism, making them blind for their own sides atrocities.
You can be pro Palestine and still condemn Hamas. You can be critical of the Israeli government and still grief for all the innocent Hamas victims. It's not actually that hard to be a decent human being.

[–] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

uhhhHHHH nuh-uh dude, you have to pick ONE OR THE OTHER

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 1 year ago

So frustrating that this is a point that needs arguing in the modern day.

[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

The travesty is how many people are unable to say this out loud. Everyone is stuck in their black & white tribalism, making them blind for their own sides atrocities.

Personally I don't want to say it out loud because I'm just so mentally exhausted from the screaming. I know (like know, not just feel) that if I say this out loud in a more public space then somebody is gonna scream at me over it. And I just don't want that anymore. I feel in this instance it's better to just keep silent because I just hate it when people get so uppity at me over this kind of thing.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I got downvoted for arguing with a douche that was actively taking sides in a debate over which side kills more children.

This is where we are now.

[–] hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean it's not a debate, Israel by 36x.

(2008-2020 because those are the numbers I was able to find: https://www.ochaopt.org/data/casualties)

[–] DeForrest_McCoy@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Strong Agree ! You took the words right out of my mouth.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can be pro-palestinian people and still think that after several decades of not being able to suppress the violent factions inside their nation, they should completely bail off from that general area.

[–] sanzky@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

would you say that to people in every single colonialist country? e.g. the US?

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

USA seemed to rather successfully suppress the violent factions inside their nation, several times.

[–] sanzky@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

their nation was literally built on top of violence.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's probably the norm. Finland, the posterboy of peace, started its independence with a civil war and continued by joining the Nazis in WW2 against Soviet Union.

Seems to me that there are two kinds of nations on this planet: dead ones and those that were at some point based on violence.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

All nations are built and maintained by violence, either directly or by threat of it.

It's a core component of sovereignty. To be able to call your government sovereign you must have the capacity to resist both external and internal actors from being able to overthrow you.

You must also be willing and able to use violence against those under your rule who disobey your laws (i.e, arresting a murderer).