thatKamGuy

joined 1 year ago
[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 33 points 5 days ago

Hilariously, if the corporations could have curtailed their greed for a few more years - piracy could have sufficiently reduced in popularity and need to the point that it would have largely become a ‘lost art’.

Alas, chasing ever higher returns because “line must go up” is just introducing a new generation to these old tried and true methods.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I know the whole USB-A super-state thing is a meme at this point, but you can easily plug in cables first try with these two points:

  1. USB cables tend to have a logo on the upwards facing part.
  2. If you know/can visualise how the PCB is mounted, you can identify which was is up on the port.

That being said, USB-C is definitely more convenient overall - but I do wish the cables were male and ports female (think Lightning), so that the most fragile part of the connector was on the cable and not the device. Because when that breaks, it’s easier to get a new cable than re-solder a port.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t think Russia’s affording all that much nowadays.. last I heard, they were experiencing liquidity issues trading with China?

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The best way to look at it is to ask “if he cared less about his appearance, and dressed more slovenly - would it excuse his abhorrent views and stances?”.

If the answer is no, then it should be a non-factor.

A cynical part of me thinks that some of the more outlandish politicians dress that way (Trump’s hair dye and fake tan, JD Vance’s guyliner, Boris Johnson’s unkempt hair, etc.) are done in part as an attempt to de-rail reporting by having us fall into the easy trap of ridiculing their appearance rather than criticising their views and actions.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Going by that argument though, then EVERYTHING is an indirect act of God.

Bullet wound? Clearly it was God’s will, for ordering the universe in such a way that an individual was armed at that point in time to cause you harm.

Cancer? God willed the carcinoma onto your skin.

Maybe it’s just Argumentum ad absurdum, but insurance companies are basically arguing against their own existence.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I remember reading somewhere that it was likely something he picked up from his wife, as it is apparently not uncommon in India?

That could have been a lie, but honestly who cares how the guy chooses to dress or present? His views and words are toxic enough that we don’t need to resort to personal attacks on his appearance; calling him and his ilk ‘weird’ is more cutting to them than anything else.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

It was called Kurushi here in our neck of the woods; and I’m glad I’m not the only person who still intensely remembers that game from a demo disc.

I ended up picking up a mint copy to add to my collection; well worth it IMO.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He did write it, after a bout of inspiration brought on by the first time he power-slammed Andre the Giant. Which just so happened to be in front of a sold out crowd at the Roman Colloseum in 600 CE, because he also invented time travel.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Missing:

Resident Evil (2002) $103m ($180m adjusted)

..of the rest of the movies on your list, I have only not seen Hitman and Five Nights at Freddy’s; but I would be pretty safe in betting that they would both be more enjoyable than Borderlands.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

I specified one generation of hardware backwards compatibility; beyond that software emulation would be more than sufficient.

The PS5 is backwards compatible with all but ~6 PS4 titles. Sure that’s entirely because of the shared x86-64 architecture, but it makes the PS4 stand out like a sore thumb for its lack of direct generational backwards compatibility.

By the end of the PS3’s lifecycle the Cell processor has been die-shrunk multiple times, reducing power consumption, heat output and PCB space required. It could then share the rest of the PS4s existing IO chips and circuitry.

There was literally no reason for backwards compatibility to be removed beyond corporate greed. Blindly accepting it, and actually trying to justify that as a good thing is one of the key reasons this hobby has gone down the toilet.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Hard to improve on perfection, but they had to keep their UI designers employed I suppose?

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It really wasn’t sustainable for ~~the future~~ maximising shareholder profits.

Maintaining PS3 backwards compatibility at launch was well within Sony’s operating profits. It was an international decision, which they proceeded to gaslight customers into believing want necessary or even wanted!

view more: next ›