pftbest

joined 1 year ago
[–] pftbest@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Hydrogen Sulfide can damage concrete, not sure about the chair tho

[–] pftbest@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's the other way around, you will get all of the tickets which are missing plate info. Some guy did it and regrets it, there is a documentary about it.

[–] pftbest@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I can't quite understand what is your point? Are you arguing that both JVM and WASM are bad? With this I agree, they both have terrible performance and in an ideal world we wouldn't use any of them.

Are you arguing that JVM bytecode is better than WASM? That's objectively not true. One example is a function pointer in C. To compile it to JVM bytecode you would need to convert it to the virtual call using some very roundabout way. But in WASM you have native support for function pointers, which gives much better flexibility when compiling other languages.

[–] pftbest@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Have you seen what it outputs? The same way we can compile C to brainfuck, it doesn't mean it's good or is useful.

[–] pftbest@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (7 children)

You can't compile C to java bytecode, they are fundamentally incompatible. But you can compile C to wasm, which is what you want for a good universal bytecode. Java is shit.

[–] pftbest@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's in the photo look closer

[–] pftbest@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

His haircut reminds me of someone

[–] pftbest@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

For example when watching 1080p youtube video in Safari the power consumption is only 0.1watt because it's using hardware decoders. (not including display backlight, I can't measure it). But when I play the same video in firefox which is using software decoding the consumption is around 0.7w which is not as good as hw decoders, but still less than a watt

[–] pftbest@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

no, it's just an easy sustained load that can be measured accurately. If you have some other application that provides sustained load but doesn't spin all the cores to 100% please suggest it, I will try.

[–] pftbest@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I did some actual measurements just to confirm it, here is minecraft in default configuration running @ 100fps and the cpu+gpu consumption is around 6w in total. If you add about 5w for display backlight and other components the total would be 9-10 hours of play time on my 100wh battery.

https://imgur.com/a/C5QuC9v

Can you please take the same measurements on your system? Maybe ryzen system is better than intel, never had one.

view more: next ›