Programmer Humor

19145 readers

808 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Feyter@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

112

Probably the wrong meme format (programming.dev)

submitted 5 months ago by onlinepersona@programming.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

68 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Let's reinvent java bytecode but... different

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pftbest@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Have you seen what it outputs? The same way we can compile C to brainfuck, it doesn't mean it's good or is useful.

[+] onlinepersona@programming.dev -9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"compiling C to java bytecode isn't possible"
*link to project that does exactly that*
"it's not good or useful"
*WASM exists*
"that's useful"

... OK

Anti Commercial AI thingy

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] pftbest@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can't quite understand what is your point? Are you arguing that both JVM and WASM are bad? With this I agree, they both have terrible performance and in an ideal world we wouldn't use any of them.

Are you arguing that JVM bytecode is better than WASM? That's objectively not true. One example is a function pointer in C. To compile it to JVM bytecode you would need to convert it to the virtual call using some very roundabout way. But in WASM you have native support for function pointers, which gives much better flexibility when compiling other languages.