littlebluespark

joined 1 year ago
[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 45 points 8 hours ago

Because, he knows we are all powerless against him.

People never see they're in the boiling pot. Or the crab bucket. Or the slaughter line. Or the prison-filling shame machine. Or the no-one-else-is-as-special-as-you ritual paint before the holiday sacrifice. Etc.

I still hold that the "Heroes Work Here" signs all over the Bible belt would be atop guillotines instead if there were any sense salvaging this "nation". πŸ™‡πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Very few do, no matter the "side", and those with the skills & training to do so all too often eat their own guns after the dust settles. In war, the only victors are the ones pushing pawns. Every single other creature is a victim to it, in one way or another.

Not this citizen here, though. This "tal" is a real patriot, sharing half-assed hopium around like smearing shit on his teeth and grinning at us all. 🀦🏼

So, basically, they're not saying anything worthy of a headline, much less a whole article. Thanks for letting us know... smdh.

So, Gizmodo's trying to toady up to The Onion, now?

Do we have a 'best of' around here yet? 'Cause, damn. I'm in.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not to mention that those tryhards going full weeboo on gatekeeping are ignoring various other "heretical" facts of sushi's founding people, like: it's fine to add just about anything you feel like to it. Oh, is krabβ„’ in poor taste? What about ice cream? Snack chips? I mean, FFS, the Japanese have built a global reputation for taking a concept and improving on its efficiency or efficacy or both, all the while these scrote-bearded trogs are pinching their puds to dreams of katanas and isekai redemption. πŸ€ͺ

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Please, don't call it that. It was, yes, technically "the president" at the time, but we don't have to call it that anymore, or ever again β€” even when referring to that (not brief enough) period in history.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"We" don't get it at all, if we don't want to.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

because I refuse to subscribe to the world that needs them.

Can't see that biting you in the ass, down the way.

 

Hypothetically, one could be avidly seeding terabytes of files there, but is that the only place to do so at this point? Where else could one help the cause, and find rare and/or the latest sculpts?

view more: next β€Ί