leftzero

joined 1 year ago
[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And then, we could start selling meat of the "problem animals" that we have way too many of

For a moment there I was thinking you were about to advocate for cannibalism... (sadly, prions are terrifying.)

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

They've been sinking boats off the Iberian coast (possibly for fun, possibly for vengeance) for a few years now, so at least some seem to be trying...

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Problem is that stuff seems to be more lemonated caffeine than caffeinated lemonade.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

Sounds more like an enlightened centrist to me, but same difference really.

If a maniac wanted to shoot someone ten times, and the victim wated not to be shot, the enlightened centrist would smugly proclaim that the maniac shooting the victim five times would be a just middle ground that'd be fair to both parties, and that the victim would be unreasonable, intolerant, and antidemocratic for not agreeing to it.

Same result, orders of magnitude more hypocrisy and idiocy, and of course you can't criticise them, since by enabling the maniacs they're just debating and trying to find a compromise, and disagreeing with them is being hostile and going against the very principles of democracy itself.

Malignant asshats, the whole lot of them, wouldn't recognize the paradox of tolerance if you violently hit them in the head with it.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

Good, ban boomers too, then.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

I'm not sure Townscaper can be called a game either, but it certainly is an excellent relaxing and enjoyable way to waste one's time.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Newton did dabble quite a bit in alchemy, biblical studies, and the occult, possibly as much as in mathematics and natural philosophy.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And there's two of them, giving slightly different images (but without the whole circuitry developed at a young age that manages to calculate distances from the slight differences between the two images... hell, they might even lack the circuitry that corrects for the images being upside down, at that!).

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Huh, I'm kind of surprised it didn't come up with Terminator 2, which at least would fit the freezing and shattering bit.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Might be that the training set is too old; “That one with the fat dragon” got me Kung Fu Panda, because Po, while not a dragon, was fat.

Similar prompts (see my other replies to the OP) for older films seem to work, so Honour Among Thieves might be to recent. (Which would highlight one of the main issues with these large language models: they have to be periodically retrained with new data for them to remain accurate and practical.)

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

OK, last last one; “That one with Bill Murray and the gopher” got me Caddyshack, which I haven't seen but does seem to be a better match than Groundhog Day, which is what I was going for (trying to see if the AI could figure out I was mixing my rodents; turns out there are too many Bill Murray rodent focused films for that to be a valid test, my bad).

I had to do it in a third browser 'cause the login prompt came back, though, so I won't be doing any more attempts, between that and the GDPR prompt it's pretty clear they don't want people using their site. Shame, as the tool seems pretty good, but what can you do. 🤷‍♂️

view more: ‹ prev next ›