drinkwaterkin

joined 3 days ago
[–] drinkwaterkin@lemm.ee -3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

"The Soviet Union (1922–1991) had a long history of state atheism, whereby those who were seeking social success generally had to profess atheism and stay away from places of worship; this trend became especially militant during the middle of the Stalinist era, which lasted from 1929 to 1953."

"The Communist Party engaged in diverse activities such as destroying places of worship, executing religious leaders, flooding schools and media with anti-religious propaganda, and propagated "scientific atheism".[55][56] It sought to make religion disappear by various means.[57][58] Thus, the USSR became the first state to have as one objective of its official ideology the elimination of the existing religion, and the prevention of the future implanting of religious belief, with the goal of establishing state atheism (gosateizm)."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_atheism

[–] drinkwaterkin@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago

Yes, allergies and rare conditions are a thing sometimes. In your own example that doesn't change the principle that whole grains are still the cornerstone of even this hypothetical person's diet - they just have to avoid gluten.

[–] drinkwaterkin@lemm.ee 2 points 14 hours ago

The good time vs long time idea is a false dichotomy. Unhealthy lifestyles fuel depression and other cognitive disorders. The long life is the happiest life.

[–] drinkwaterkin@lemm.ee 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

You sure you're not just eating poorly and thinking you're eating healthy? There's a significant amount of misinformation in nutrition, on par with climate denialism.

[–] drinkwaterkin@lemm.ee 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I can think of some things. The first is that there's a real chance that, if you are living an unhealthy lifestyle, it is likely actively fueling the depressed-sounding state of mind you seem to be in. I know when things seem hopeless it's hard to want to try, but it's the successes in small decisions like that which can help us claw our way out of these pits.

The next is that relying on the "next incarnation" is wishful thinking that, I think there is a stronger case to be made that it's more likely to be disappointing than it is an improvement. We don't know how many realities there are, we don't know how many of them we would ever see (or if we could ever see others) after death, or whether or not there is anything of "us" after death to experience anything in the future. But if we're seeing the one world we do know is there, getting worse, then whatever else there is or what we can experience, we now know the total amount of them has gotten worse by this much. Put into more simple terms, we lay in the bed we make. What if you reincarnate/rebirth into a factory-farmed cow for example? There's only one sure-fire way to reduce the odds of that happening - making the choices that lead to fewer factory farmed cows coming into existence.

Death is not an escape. There is no escape. The only way out is through.

Then the other thing that has fueled some of my own decisions, is that we promote what we do, to others. If I were to smoke cigarettes for example, I would be making it more likely that those in my life, the people I care about, would be more likely to also start smoking. From that point of view, literally every choice we make has consequences that probably shouldn't be taken lightly.

[–] drinkwaterkin@lemm.ee 2 points 23 hours ago

That was me for a while, then I decided I was done learning computer. 💩

[–] drinkwaterkin@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago

I remember one of my exes repeated a statistic a lot, "one in three women are raped at least once in their life."

I don't think you're appreciating the challenge of these circumstances when "not all men" might literally be the exception, not the rule.

[–] drinkwaterkin@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

I remember around 15 years ago I was excited to get my first computer with a dedicated graphics card, a laptop with Nvidia Optimus. It was also around the time I was just beginning to get into Linux. I found an Ubuntu forum post with detailed instructions on installing Ubuntu and setting it up properly on that exact laptop, so I tried to follow that.

It didn't help that I was unfamiliar with using the terminal at the time. But even so, this was before tools like Bumblebee were in a usable state (is Bumblebee still the preferred way to use Optimus?). I remember getting to the part about graphics switching and seeing some messy confusing hack for it. I don't remember the specifics, but I think it involved importing a script and using diff to patch something. And I think all it did was just disable the very gpu I was looking forward to trying out.

I jumped back and forth between distros and Windows 7 a lot at that time. But it was such a shitty experience all because of Nvidia that I have never purchased any of their products since then. I've owned a lot of computers in that time, and I'm just one customer lost. I hope Nvidia looks at AMD sales and wonders how many of them are users that Nvidia lost because things like that.

[–] drinkwaterkin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Misandry is getting increasingly prevalent, and it does suck. But at the same time, at least on an individual basis, I can hardly blame people for it. I don't know if I've ever known a single woman has never been assaulted by a man. The fact is we collectively do have to do better.

[–] drinkwaterkin@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

There's too much loneliness going around regardless of gender, so no, a sweeping generalization about an entire group probably isn't the most helpful idea. Nor does it address the real problems.

[–] drinkwaterkin@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Because you're presupposing that copyright is right in the first place. Distribution of information has been made free - because of the internet it's the one thing so far where the Star Trek future has been made reality. But intellectual property laws are designed to create artificial scarcity so that one publisher can monopolize a creative work, to the detriment of everyone else.

Fans of various game franchises are not just consumers, but creators in their own right. You have to remember that this delegitimized practice of "piracy" also results in the entire romhacking community.

The bottom line is that free sharing of information benefits us all and produces a rich commons, but intellectual property plunders that commons and produces centralization of media ownership while stripping away our right to be co-creators.

[–] drinkwaterkin@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

I have a Steam Deck definitely felt no need to get either the Switch 1 or 2.

view more: next ›