[-] deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago

I don't believe that is accurate. Beside moons (which don't orbit the sun), Pluto is the largest and closest dwarf planet.

[-] deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

If those are the only options, I am choosing juggalo

[-] deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Chatgpt... please summarize the Gartner hype cycle for a 5 year old

[-] deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It's called accelerationism and it is stupid

[-] deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Hmmm anyone remember when Andrew Yang was running for president and said that data was the new oil and that people should own the content they put on social media?

[-] deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Sure and people who think you can't have monetary policy with crypto are too uninformed to be worth discussing the merits of each system.

I'm sure we can all wax lyrical about what we think money is and lord knows whenever cryptocurrency is brought up the armchair currency experts are always there. So thank you for that!

[-] deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Yeah the quality of content has definitely degraded since the API changes and these insular hive minded communities have only become more so, probably because those are the type of people that stayed. And Lemmy just isn't quite there in terms of catering to niche topics that was keeping me on reddit.

78

When I first joined Reddit I really enjoyed the conversations I had with other people. I don't really care about internet points and I always just sought out people whose opinions are different than my own to get diverse perspectives. In this way, subreddits centered around a particular point of view would guarantee me a conversation that was engaging and perhaps an opportunity to learn something.

But lately I noticed that moderators on that site have been using their bans to simply silence dissenting opinions and control the narrative and looking through moderator code of conduct it seems that the practice is not discouraged at all.

The first ban I ever received on that site was just a few months ago when I wrote just two sentences in response to someone. My post was not offensive in any way and I was writing in good faith. This was also the first time I ever posted on that subreddit. The moderator who permanently banned me claimed I was just to stupid to be allowed to continue posting in their community.

I am certainly capable of profound stupidity but just not the type one could devise in just a few sentences so I suspect that moderator was not being genuine with me.

Since then I have received two more permanent bans for posts which again were made in good faith and not racist, sexist, or displaying any obvious reason to take such a drastic action. Never a warning that I was violating the rules or a even a temporary ban. When I ask the moderator why, I get "muted". A permanent ban should be for obvious trolling, spammers or people who repeatedly violate the subreddit rules. Not for just expressing a different opinion.

I feel like a certain breed of moderator has hijacked most of the subreddits I would have once found interesting to participate in. They come with a mandate to advance a specific agenda and it seems like Reddit's fate has to become just like every other social media website that groups people by their beliefs while re-enforcing and radicalizing them.

Oh and the first moderator that banned me, he is active on the fediverse as well and they have re-created their community on kbin. So I suspect these types of people will eventually control the communities here as well.

[-] deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

What you are saying is inaccurate...

  1. BTC has a performant layer 2 called lightning. And if layer 2s are not your jam, there are plenty of L1s that can handle 1000s of transactions per second

  2. Crypto solves the problem of having a central bank control the money supply. Also having private organizations controlling digital payment rails. Provides options or underbanked people in countries with unstable financial systems. I could go on....

  3. Blockchains do not use an enormous amount of energy. You are thinking of the consensus mechanism used by proof of work cryptocurrencies. There are alternative consensus mechanisms that use much less energy

Also the adoption rates are not a measure of utility. The Linux desktop has been around 30 years and has an adoption rate under 5 percent. Mastodon has not grown as fast as twitter did. Democracy is not used by the majority of governments and where it is, voter turnout is low.

Is it also your opinion that these things are bad products?

Decentralized systems just take longer to mature. It's crazy to me that fediverse users don't understand this.

[-] deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

I recently left a WFH only company. The environment was toxic and there was definitely some insecurity on the part of management regarding worker productivity. There was a much larger emphasis on constantly showing to management what you were working on and proving you were using your work day productively.

It was a culture shift I didn't adapt well to and left.

[-] deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

One use for RSS feeds is to distribute podcasts to multiple apps. I believe most podcasts apps are just RSS readers combined with an audio player.

[-] deadlyduplicate@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Genetic diversity protects a species against epidemic disease

view more: next ›

deadlyduplicate

joined 1 year ago