They had it roll the other way
It makes the statement worse but not the article. I find the article pretty objective
Tell me you judged the article by its title without telling me....
If you had read it, you'd notice that the author does not feel it is a game changer.
But still, even by reading the title alone, you mussed the quotation signs. It is not the author who calls it game changer but the chief developer.
Sorry I meant the world as in the the world leaders. With this issue, there seems to be some interest conflicts between what the public wants and what the country leaders want
I totally agree that there is no need or justification for people being billionaires.
My point is, that the people of Gaza and Palestinians as such would be more or less fine, if they weren't being oppressed by their neighbor, both now during the war, but even since 1948
I don't get it. Is it unfortunate placement, because it displays the contrast between people in need and people with much more than they need?
The way I see it, the people of Gaza are not poor. They are being actively starved and killed. Many if not most of them had jobs, and companies and education.
What is unfortunate is not the placement of the posts. What is unfortunate, to say the least, is that the world seems to not care!
Legitimate question: Who exactly is it that won't attend her inauguration? Were they invited, but refused to attend? Who else from the US is going?
Also, congrats to Mexico! sounds like a great choice for a president!
It's known that they are quite anti-semitic
I love it when isrealis reveal that they can't differentiate between their nationality and the religion
Christian taliban
No matter what, it's always the employer who should pay the whole wages even when you're being waited on
5sec vs 3x20sec.
Easy choice
Unless people buy the medium instead. Then its good buziness