charonn0

joined 2 years ago
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 59 points 1 year ago

That's an interesting euphemism for tax fraud.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

After an open call for international volunteers, the Ukrainian military attracted nearly 20,000 fighters from around the world. Within weeks, there were already so-called American “Boogaloo Bois” flying out.

The author of this article would really appreciate it if you didn't look into that 20K figure.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago

Right? It's obviously an orchard, not a forest, and obviously the apples are one of the popular commercial cultivars rather than some wild natural variant.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 16 points 1 year ago

Which is why it's a batshit insane idea.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a fatal problem. That's a shame.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

Which is exactly why the output of an AI trained on copyrighted inputs should not be copyrightable. It should not become the private property of whichever company owns the language model. That would be bad for a lot more reasons than the potential for laundering open source code.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website -5 points 1 year ago

The part that you're apparently having trouble understanding is that a language model is not a human mind and a human mind is not a language model.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago (14 children)

If it's not infringement to input copyrighted materials, then it's not infringement to take the output.

Copyright can be enforced at both ends or neither end, not one or the other.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It wouldn't. The 14th specifically says Congress can remove the insurrection disqualification.

view more: ‹ prev next ›