charonn0

It could certainly be used as evidence in your favor. Whether it by itself would be enough to exonerate you would depend on things like the evidence against you and how much weight the jury gave to your records.

These are known as souvenir plots. Generally, you aren't buying the land, but rather you're buying a contractual right to prevent the actual owner from developing the land.

Californian. No.

It wouldn't solve any problems that can't be solved by other means, and it would create new problems that we haven't had to worry about before. It'd be a net loss for everyone involved.

Insufficient data for a meaningful answer.

These are the same Senators who argued ex-presidents can't be impeached.

How did you post a empty comment?

Terrible technique. Everyone knows it's left hands only.

The state government isn't involved with collecting federal taxes, so how could this be done?

Usually only the first time. Subsequent playthroughs no.

UI elements that expand and cover up other UI elements when you mouse over them.

"Flat" color schemes where you can't even tell where one UI element ends and the other begins.

Infinite scroll instead of pagination.

He'll have to show us his Earth certificate, though.

Please drink a verification can to continue