[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 1 points 16 hours ago

Honestly I was expecting far more downvotes. I posted the video with people like you in mind, who still ~~can think critically~~ are marks without the burden of ~~misinformation and ideology.~~ not being marks.

Ftfy

By the way, if you think you are not subject to ideology, I have several things to sell you.

For anyone else reading: everyone is subject to ideology. The moment you think you arent, that is when you are most trapped by it.

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago

And by "take over" you mean uselessly posture and dick waggle and colonialize in brand new space accords breaking ways.

This is not something anyone is winning.

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 10 points 4 days ago

A green buildings designer might develop new environmentally friendly materials for construction projects,”

So instead of referencing the jobs that already exist, scientist, r&d, particularly materials scientists, or mentioning civil engineers, they made up an entirely new job and are shocked it doesn't exist yet.

Corporate writers are incredibly out of touch.

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 4 points 5 days ago

It is not the first commercially funded fusion reactor even assuming this qualified.

https://www.energystartups.org/top/fusion-energy/

Not hard to find a bunch.

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

In what sense? They still have not achieved net power out.

Also "q>10 new reactor by 2027"

...🤣

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sometimes relaxing regulatory measures leads to people following them better, as they better match the intent of the regulation rather than being seen as absurd. It also lowers the 'benefit' of deviancy from that regulation.

Sometimes you're right, you regulate more extremely than the intent because people will follow it better, or it makes it easier to enforce.

The point is there's not a one size fits all.

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 19 points 6 months ago

Ooooh another supercomputer claiming to surpass or approach a human brain. Cute! The simulations it'll run will probably be pretty neat though.

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 19 points 7 months ago

"I know nothing about Thing In Video but I will choose to vehemently insist this can't be Thing It Obviously Is, also it's fine they shot at a civilian with no regard for rules of engagement anyway."

Bruh

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Trilium for a database and therefore faster method that is actually foss.

Obsidian is reaching market criticality so I'm expecting enshitification any time now.

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 24 points 9 months ago

Im going to correct and elaborate here.

Just taken at face value this claim is wrong. What you're thinking of is that you can often get military hardware in media, as in tanks, soldiers as extras, uniforms, 3d models of vehicles, etc. Directly from the military/dod. These are things which often cost millions of dollars, you can occasionally get them for free in your movie. The caveat is generally that then the dod is allowed to vet and veto scenes and uses, the expectation being that they can kick out anything that depicts the military in a bad lens, more or less.

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 43 points 9 months ago

You just don't digest as much nor store as much calories. So your feces and urine, as well as exhalation.

It's not cheating basic physics, there's just a lot of misunderstanding about how weight works in biology. Cico is not what many people believe it to be.

view more: next ›

Umbrias

joined 1 year ago