[-] Tired8281@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I don't see the problem. They obviously would hire more people to do double the episode load.

[-] Tired8281@lemmy.world 47 points 11 months ago

Like it or not, it's tech news. When Intel does something interesting, or Google wets the bed again, we'll talk about that a lot, then. Right now it's Elon doing dumb stuff. Last month it was spez. If we ban every hot news topic, what's left to discuss?

[-] Tired8281@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Threatens, as in, hasn't happened and may not. Not all threats are true.

idk how well stuff works on Chrome Mobile. I use a different Chrome-based mobile browser that does allow extensions, and Ublock Origin works great on it. Turns out there's more than one way to skin a cat. Who knew?

I'm well read on Manifest v3. I'm also aware of a Ublock Origin version that is designed to work under it. I have it installed and ready to go, for if and when the old one stops working. But that has only been threatened, too, and not even by Google.

I'm not certain it is just an assumption, but I am also not certain it is a prophecy. Until I get more certain, I'm not going to bust my hump worrying about it. And I'm certainly not going to bellow to the hillsides that we're all doomed.

[-] Tired8281@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They already do that from my Android phone, and I'm sure as hell not going Apple. Linux phones aren't there yet, maybe in a few years, but I'll still need an Android phone for the same reasons I'd need a Chromebok, bank apps will never support Linux phones. And yeah, like everybody said, VLANs. I already have one for untrusted IoT devices, I'll just spin up another for Chromebooks.

[-] Tired8281@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Not from them! They don't make a dime when I buy yours.

[-] Tired8281@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Google has a track record of attack articles written against them, all talking up their intentions to tank adblocking, including this attack article. And yet, my adblocker still works and my ads are still blocked. Strange that we just assume this is what they intend to do, when there's no evidence they've pulled it off, we treat it as if they have.

[-] Tired8281@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

Just means I'll have the shittiest Chromebook I can buy used, for access to the sites you just listed, and my Linux laptop for everything else. If their non-financial, non-commerce site won't let me in with my adblocking Linux machine, I just won't go there. There will be lots of site still, run by us, that don't do this shit, and they'll get my traffic.

[-] Tired8281@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I like how they made helping Reddit improve to be optional. I suspect I'm not the only one who doesn't feel inclined to help them in any way.

[-] Tired8281@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It would only work if enough people do it to show up on their metrics.

[-] Tired8281@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I worry about the long gap between season 1 and season 2. A lot of shows have really suffered with such long gaps, especially ones that are as serialized as this one is.

[-] Tired8281@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago

Report issue. You're not running an adblocker! wink

Google already has trouble with support, if they have a million lightly befuddled users who are getting blocked and "don't know why", that will be a problem for Google.

view more: next ›

Tired8281

joined 1 year ago