I think in-universe you are trying to keep the environment in balance but it's so hard to make a good story for a game exclusively about killing and wearing monsters that it never works out.
Iceborne ends with the main characters thanking Nergigante only for that particular Nergigante to be the target of a future hunt regardless.
Oh I understand now, thanks for clarifying.
It was more real time strategy than anything.
Baldurs Gate 3 did not copy the Dragon Age formula, Dragon Age did not create it in the first place.
I think the main issue is NPC quests, they are complete nonsense and fail automatically based on arbitrary triggers.
I don't mind the move to action combat but this looks a bit dated, the enemies barely do anything.
It's a good thing Doom 2016 exists then.
Star Wars will have 3 settings and 3 villains and you are going to like it.
Eternal pretty much integrates the Sci-fi story of the first game with the medieval fantasy lore it had in the codexes.
It's a bit jarring in the first few levels because you don't have a lot of the new tools so the game is still pulling it's punches in case you need to get used to 2016's mechanics I think.
I think it really clicks around the time you get the super shotgun and the mobility you get comes into play.
The tone is goofier than 2016 but in a metalhead's drug trip kinda way that works really well in my opinion.
You should give it another shot and stick with it until you have the full arsenal, it has a ridiculous amount of depth.
The new Doom looks fucking sick.
Looks great, I'm glad they are still changing things around so none of the games end up feeling the same.
The mech actually being usable this time around is awesome as well.
The questlines are so intuitive that some were missing an ending for a few months due to bugs and nobody noticed.