[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

Blaming artists? What are you smoking?

I was asking if it’s Spotify which is relatively new and, as pointed out in the article MUST get this contract or die, or if the problem might be the big three that hold all the power in this negotiation.

Speaking of which. Isn’t it the big three that actually pay the artists. So how would Spotify, if they were so inclined, manage that payout? (It’s an interest idea though. I wonder what would happen if they offered a tip-the-artist button).

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 93 points 6 months ago

Is Spotify the villain here or is the “big three”? Because it sounds like Spotify is delivering a service and deserves some profit from that.

But what are the big three doing? Seems like they are just skimming because they hold the IP rights. Are they providing any service?

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

The burrito butt is the juiciest bestest bit.

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Stop walking so loud. It’s making us mole people very very angry.

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Wait. Baked into your thoughts here is an idea that each middle manager up the chain deserves “more” and that isn’t substantiated.

Managing a bunch of people may/mayn’t be harder than doing a difficult job w/ customers or manual labor or whatever. In some cases it’s a relatively kooshy desk job compared to “being in the trenches”.

Yes, sometimes decisions at higher levels has more ramifications. This is why we want good talent in those roles. But it’s a cultural choice that we decide to pay them 100s of times more.

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

I've totally got the money to buy a new car. My 2005 forester is getting long in the tooth and i'm ready to replace it.

I want a smallish car with the same basic features: AWD, 4door, boxy rear so I can toss a full size mtn bike in there, good in the snow, etc.

My distinct impression is that the manufacturers want to sell high end (all the options and $$) but don't give a shit about usability. Chevy volt comes close but can't take a bike.

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

“One report suggested that the man may have moved near the robot with a box in his hands, which could have triggered the machine’s reaction.”

Seems like a dumb way to check though.

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

“He had been sent to the plant to examine whether the machine was working properly.”

It doesn’t sound like it was

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 115 points 7 months ago

Yeah. This is the real issue here.

Sex work should be legal and the morality discussion here is about people lying to their spouses and if anybody is being forced into sex work… all interesting topics.

But anybody implicated in this situation needs all security clearances and access dropped because they are high risk morons.

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

And to make matters worse I’m not spending free moments learning more and more computer science — but am instead reading internet stuff about material science. I can enjoy my wide ranging brain but agree that sometimes I wish I was more focused.

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

"stock will become worthless"

I'm thinking the opposite might happen.

If big companies succeed in capturing the knowledge workers market share and transferring all those salaries into their own profits then it will be reflected in the stock prices of those big companies. People, mostly currently rich people, who own those stock will benefit.

Same as it ever was for other forms of automation or job outsourcing. Why would this be any different?

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

7: A trump toupee (a "Trumpee" if you will)

view more: next ›

Phlogiston

joined 11 months ago