NeverNudeNo13

joined 11 months ago
[–] NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean technically... At least half of the elemental construction of both of those ingredients is chlorine... So... Technically it is.

[–] NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world 286 points 1 week ago (28 children)

Yeah but it says right on the front that it's half potassium chloride and half sodium chloride.

[–] NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world 1 points 2 months ago

Nice thanks for that. I've been pretty happy with it right out of the box and haven't really needed to do much to it, but nice to know there are options.

[–] NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I as well use a Anker powerconf camera and it's fantastic... But you will need a windows machine if you want to modify firmware settings on it as their control app runs in windows. It does seem that once you modify those settings they are persistent within the hardware itself though and once you move it back to the Linux machine it should all be preserved.

Of course it's possible someone has already closed that gap out already or maybe the app runs in wine.

[–] NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world 5 points 4 months ago

And several times throughout the story you are forced into making some "decisions" about how to deal with stale memory registers.

[–] NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world 1 points 7 months ago

This is the silliest shit I've ever discussed on the Internet. I will say kudos to you for keeping things mostly amicable. It's been awhile since I've had an argument on topicality and it's been entertaining for me. Thanks my friend, best wishes.

[–] NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Velocity is not suggestive because it is defined as speed in a direction.

In your example you are only taking speed, assuming direction and stating velocity.

[–] NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

That's not how legal systems work... Plenty of things are legal in one place and illegal in another. No Christians are worried about blasphemy against Zeus or Jupiter. Like wise a Zoroastrian is only concerned about blasphemy against Ahura Mazda and not Allah.

[–] NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

Okay... Which one? It's pretty clear that decaffeinated coffee violates no religions that I'm aware of... And in fact for some religions would be the only allowable way to drink coffee. And if you argue that I just meant in general that it is a slight on to any God then how would you interpret that as anything other than humor or sarcasm?

Do you always feel like a victim or is it just when you aren't caffeinated enough?

[–] NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world 1 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Opinions, such as "all methods of decaffeinating coffee are blasphemy" are subjective in their very nature. What makes this more obvious is that the definition of blasphemy is entirely subjective and can't even begin to be assessed objectively until at very minimum a religious dogma is declared for the basis of evaluation.

[–] NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world 0 points 7 months ago (10 children)

That's because words on their own all have definitions. The subjectivity is created contextually. I swear it feels like I'm talking to a bot.

[–] NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How do you gather? You think there isn't many ways to decaffeinate beans or that some of them aren't gross? Or that most ways used to decaffeinate beans doesn't make the coffee taste bad?

These are the very points James makes in the first 2/3rds of the video.

The only point that he and I might delaminate on was that all decaf is blasphemous, and that's a stretch because he never talks about the religious criminality of drinking coffee?

Why do you think I would offer a video to people about decaf that I didn't watch? Hint: I don't hate decaf coffee.

view more: next ›