MightBeAlpharius

joined 1 year ago
[–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

I've worked in retail, and... That's not an actual RFID alarm sticker, and it's not just there for the potential theives.

Some manufacturers will actually put an RFID tag on the inside of the box. These tags work exactly like the RFID stickers, and they're deactivated the same way (usually a magnet underneath the store's counter).

This sticker is actually a "chip away" anti-theft sticker. They frequently go on the same products that get RFID stickers, but all they do is tear apart instead of peeling off. They're mostly an internal tool for LP to try to link thefts and fraudulent returns (that number is the store number that it came from). This one just happens to conveniently have "ALARM" printed on it as a secondary feature, letting thieves know that the item will set off the alarm without showing where the RFID tag is.

Edit: I should probably add that they also put them on high-theft non-alarmed items, but they probably didn't get separate sets of stickers.

[–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Wait... Y'all are talking about X-Wing: Rogue Squadron and Star Wars Episode 1: Battle for Naboo, right?

I owned those windows ports!

They worked great back in the day - I had such a blast with them that I begged my parents to get me a shitty Logitech joystick! If you want to check them out, it looks like Rogue Squadron is only $10 on Steam; and Battle for Naboo seems to be abandonware, but it seems to be hosted on a lot of "better spread than dead" game sites.

[–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I think there may have been a tragic misunderstanding... It looks like they were using X as a placeholder, rather than the noun that Elon wants it to be; but the sentence construction could have been clearer.

Something like "I think X is wrong, but I want it to be legal for me to do wrong things Y and Z" might be a bit closer to what they were going for.

[–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

If you're into hard sci-fi and you're looking for a good read, they actually dropped a pretty good recommendation with that reference at the end - Larry Niven does a great job of blending real-world theories like Dyson spheres and advanced propulsion drives, with some of the more far-flung standards of the genre like an intra-planetary teleportation grid.

[–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (4 children)

That makes a lot of sense, actually. I also saw "fully electric" and immediately thought of electric/hybrid/ICE cars, and my brain went straight to "hold up, did I miss the fully functional diesel-powered humanoid robot?"

[–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Nah, it looks like it was sarcasm. "Unalive" and "commit sodoku" are both sort of combination meme/euphemisms, in the same way that we might have said that someone "an heroed" a little over a decade ago.

[–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 45 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I don't want to be a downer, but... The rats probably aren't high if they're just eating weed. Buckle up, y'all, time for a stoner science lesson:

THC is present in cannabis in two main forms: THCA and Delta-9 THC. Throwing around those delta numbers can seem scary given all of the unregulated Delta-8 in illegal states, but it's really not. THCA breaks down into Delta-9 THC naturally with time and heat, through a process called decarboxylization... Which is great, because THCA isn't psychoactive, while Delta-9 THC is. Because of this, smoking a joint or eating a properly made edible will get you high, but eating an entire ounce is just having a terrible salad.

[–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're fine - I grew up in a rural state, and I thought they were super rare until I lived in a city where the public transit system gave them as change.

[–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's actually a really good analogy. Mind if I throw some numbers on it to flesh things out?

Let's set that moving walkway going at 5mph, and we'll put ourselves on that walkway, on a turned-off rascal scooter. The scooter is stationary on the belt, but it's still moving at 5mph - that's your tailwind pushing the air around the plane forward.

Now, let's turn that scooter on and throttle it up to 5mph. The scooter is plugging along comfortably at 5mph, but it's actually moving at 10mph. This is your plane flying with a tailwind, performing normally for its indicated air speed, while having a much higher ground speed.

Curiously, this does make the phrase "supersonic speeds" somewhat debatable. While they were traveling over the ground faster than sound would, they weren't moving faster than sound would in the air around them.

[–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I feel like I would use it voluntarily if it put the sponsors in the "add a destination" menu. I tend to use Google maps for longer trips, and I try to add any stops on the way to my route so I don't miss them - if I hit "add destination" and it offered, for example, Citgo stations, 7-11s, and Dunkin Donuts on my route, then I would probably get gas and snacks at sponsored locations almost every time.

As it is, though... Well, just having a Dunks on the way to the laundromat doesn't make me want to stop in and buy a coffee. Driving by ten of them "randomly" on my way to another state isn't going to make me any more likely to stop at one.

[–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, that's actually what the complimentary branded matchbooks that smoke shops and strip clubs used to give away were meant to be!

They weren't an ad directed at you, though - they were an ad directed at your friends. You'd go hang out somewhere, set your cigarettes and matches down, and people would see the logo.

[–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Basically, yeah.

Essentially, old folks have always taken up a good chunk of the housing market by having a bunch of small households (think two sets of grandparents vs a family of four). However, the baby boom was, well, a baby boom - as the boomers are aging, they're taking up a lot more housing than the preceding generation did at their age, which is squeezing the market as younger folks try to buy houses.

view more: next ›