Lavitz

So you think in order for people to not work their lives away we would have to take up subsistence farming? With all the tech and machines we have the only viable way to not be a company man is to give away all of the luxuries we currently have?

How's that Kool aid tasting?

The dude mentioned a medical disability, stated he couldn't eat solid food or cook and you assume he can drive and then criticize him for delivery? He didn't spell out that he couldn't drive but it was pretty obvious if you read the post... Say sorry and move on buddy. You're in the wrong and look like an incel loser when you continue to double down.

Right? Sounds like a great place to work. They'll be attracting the best and brightest with PR like this.

Hey I'm just poking fun. That first comment was obviously a joke, you took it seriously so I ran with your logic and replied to you in the same way.

That's why I did it! Did you read the comment you were responding to? Being applied to a completely different argument?

Right? I'm not sure if the tech industry is just going all in on the scam and trying to get as much of our money as they can or if we're actually about to have some kind of huge technological breakthrough.

I would argue that while you're correct you're not 100% correct and overlooking a lot of nuances in history. If you want to look at it like that the empire fractured into two, there was a war and the winning side engulfed the other. None of the things you bring up as examples were accomplished with just unity and lobbying, all of these causes involved violence or the threat of violence. Don't go over simplifying history, a lot of people died for those rights. I by no means am advocating for these liars or violence but history has proven liars like this can be very dangerous and should not be laughed off.

Look buddy, I'm from the south and this is a talking point for Confederate sympathizers. This train of thought has no substance to it. The civil war didn't just happen to people, slavery did. People did what they had to do to get out and there's nothing authoritarian about that. You're not being more intelligent than everyone else and you're not the smartest person in the room like this gentleman would like you to believe, you're being gullible.

Talk shit, get hit. That's how free speech works. You can say whatever the hell you want but words have consequences and consequences can suck.

Again I think you're missing the point. I would argue it is a product and a service. They are hosting us on their servers but they're also playing dungeon master. If you just want a shooter where you shoot bugs they have them but Helldiver's is more than that. You couldn't come close to emulating what the game accomplishes on a self hosted server with you and your friends. The point is you're playing with randos that you have to rely on to do their part so that you don't die and to complete the major orders.

What I'm trying to say is IMO an offline version wouldn't be worth playing. The shared victories and failures can't be simulated and that's the nature of this kind of video game. There's been a lot of similar games so I understand the reluctance to join in but the comradery they've built through PvE is really something.

Helldivers 2 is not shutting down anytime soon and I doubt they'll offer an offline mode in the near future. If you're not playing the major orders and watching the direction of the game in real time you're going to miss out on a lot of the story and the lore. That's how live games work. There isn't a story mode or anything resembling it. Sony got wrapped up in a bunch of controversy and it left a bad taste in everyone's mouth but AH has been trying to do what's right. They sold 12,000,000 copies and on an average Tuesday there's 150,000 players playing at any time. I get the hate for having to be connected to the Internet to play a game but that's kind of the schtick for Helldivers whether you're into or not.