7-2
I bet, can guess who those 2 were without even looking.
Justice Clarence Thomas reached back to the earliest days of the Constitution in his majority opinion to note that “the Bureau’s funding mechanism fits comfortably with the First Congress’ appropriations practice.”
Hmmm..... surprising.... maybe public pressure does work.
Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, Thomas’ colleagues in the court’s conservative bloc, dissented. “The Court upholds a novel statutory scheme under which the powerful Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) may bankroll its own agenda without any congressional control or oversight,” Alito wrote.
No more powerful then the billionaires that get to bribe officials and run the show.
The jury haven't even made a ruling yet.... All they've done is listen.....
Not even an excuse? , if the jury only has one side of the story that is what they are going with.
If you aren't even going to put your fists up and spend all your time arguing with the referee, you can't complain when you get KO'ed