Dark_Blade

joined 1 year ago
[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Rossman is a device repairman tbf, he sees the worst of the worst phones out there.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (6 children)

I mean, that sucks for you but pull-tabs are considered ‘repair-friendly’ by pretty much everyone in the Right to Repair movement.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

They’re fixing security issues left and right. Could be them being more diligent for once, could be more exploits that need urgent fixing.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I don’t even get why a removable backplate is necessary when the battery is a ‘once every 2 years’ replacement. Why would I want my phone’s entire design to be compromised for a replacement that my phone will probably only see twice, maybe thrice?

Plus, hot-swappable batteries would carry the risk of people replacing batteries and just tossing away the spare like garbage. At least now, the procedure is restricted to businesses and people who probably have enough sense to recycle the battery.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Dude, Apple uses pull-tabs; their batteries aren’t practically fused to the phone’s chassis like Samsung’s.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (8 children)

It’s not cemented into the chassis lol, Apple replaces it for $99 or you can just buy the part from ‘em and replace it yourself.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I care. This thing’s already thick and heavy enough, and I don’t particularly care about popping the back off my phone to replace a battery. It’s like…once every two years that I have to replace it.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

There’s also ‘don’t use it’, which is a perfectly valid option.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It really should’ve been $50 for Lifetime, at most.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The trackers were specifically there for Google’s ad service, so I assume this’ll get rid of those too.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

‘Change for the heck of it’ gives idiot execs trying to justify their jobs a raging hard-on. It also pleases the idiots trying to maximize profits on something that’s already maximized, as if destroying brand equity will draw in ‘new customers through a fresh new look and image!’

No, it’ll only waste money on failed marketing for your rebrand, confuse existing customers, and make your business look more transient and, as a result, less likely to stand the test of time.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

What a terrible way of looking at it. UX matters a lot when you’re using a platform, and some people are willing to tolerate the occasional ad if they get a UX they like and are familiar with.

view more: ‹ prev next ›