Actaeon

joined 1 year ago
[–] Actaeon@artemis.camp 5 points 1 year ago

And scale only scales one dimension… the width is unchanged.

[–] Actaeon@artemis.camp 0 points 1 year ago

Something something state department.
Something something private e-mail server.

[–] Actaeon@artemis.camp 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So it’s a fictitious fallacy

[–] Actaeon@artemis.camp 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And then responding to those tips in an appropriate and timely manner.

[–] Actaeon@artemis.camp 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least we finally know what values she was referring to

[–] Actaeon@artemis.camp 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is all kinds of stupid. Not only are these folk openly bigoted, they don’t care whether their bigotry is misapplied from their stated target. They just want to hate somebody.

[–] Actaeon@artemis.camp 1 points 1 year ago

If you missed it, I missed it too

[–] Actaeon@artemis.camp 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

🤞here’s hoping the next SE is mini sized.

[–] Actaeon@artemis.camp 2 points 1 year ago

That double tap ad was hilarious
Reminds me of the old wii ads

[–] Actaeon@artemis.camp 2 points 1 year ago

I don’t think Apple has ever made their own phone screens. They are a not a manufacturing company.

The limitation was the size of the human hand. Jobs wanted it designed to be single hand navigable. This was widely broadcast and know since the introduction of the first iPhone, and criticized once android phones got larger.

The last form factor Jobs oversaw was the 5. The screen did change so a preexisting contract wasn’t constraining the size. The screen got slightly taller but was kept the same width. It had the smallest screen of major phones released that same year, and was still smaller than the flagship android phones of the previous year.

The first form factor that jobs did not oversee was the larger 6 and even larger 6plus.

[–] Actaeon@artemis.camp 2 points 1 year ago

It’s because this WorldNews community is hosted on lemmy.ml. There’s better alternatives on @lemmy.world and @kbin.social

[–] Actaeon@artemis.camp 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

these COULD pose a huge safety risk. Until the parts are tested it is unclear if they are actually bad.
this is a badly written article

The article is correct. The safety risk is that the parts COULD be dangerous to use. Whether the parts are actually defective or not is irrelevant because they don’t know; that’s what makes them a risk.

view more: ‹ prev next ›