this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
-21 points (43.6% liked)

World News

32136 readers
1184 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From the guy's own mouth.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 44 points 1 year ago

Whoa, Putin's propaganda goes all the way to the top!

/s because I just remembered where I am

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 40 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There is nothing in this that reflects the title. It's nothing more than passive propaganda. They are relying on people to just read the title and not open the link.

What is actually said is:

And let me just end by saying that this reflects the political reality that nations are sovereign. Nations decide themselves, and Ukraine has of course the right to decide its own path. And it's up to Ukraine and NATO Allies to decide when Ukraine becomes a member. Russia cannot veto membership for any sovereign independent state in Europe.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition for not invade Ukraine. Of course we didn't sign that.

At least he had some good jokes to warm up the crowd!

I think I've told you before that I know it's hard to allocate money for defence, because most politicians want to spend money on health, on education, on infrastructure instead of defence.

[–] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Lmao holy shit. What the fuck country is he talking about? The bridges are falling apart everywhere

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago (8 children)

And let me just end by saying that this reflects the political reality that nations are sovereign.

I mean that's just factually untrue. Every nations sovereignty is restricted by geopolitical realities. No nation can just do whatever they desire, including joining certain alliances. Mexico will not be joining BRICS for instance, because of the geopolitical situation. And that's not even a military alliance, which NATO is! Europeans are not special, they have to play by the same rules as everybody else. To claim otherwise is to ignore the reality on the ground right now, both in Ukraine and globally.

Also none of this factors in that joining NATO, by definition, involves giving up some part of your nations sovereignty. NATO in reality acts as an extended arm of the US military and it's industrial complex, and in joining, countries are subjected to this reality of Atlanticism.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Actually he also said (in the link):

“The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition for not invade Ukraine. Of course we didn’t sign that.”

[–] sxan@midwest.social 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"If you don't promise to stop making new friends, I'm going to kill another one."

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

NATO is not a friend or friendly force, it is one of the great evils of our time, anyone arguing otherwise just wants to bomb third world countries.

Ask the citizens of Libya and Iraq how defensive and friendly NATO is.

The process of "joining NATO" is not anything equivalent to making friends, any country joining NATO essentially becomes a vassal for US interests. There's a reason why Sweden and Finland held out for so long.

[–] edge@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

There's a reason why Sweden and Finland held out for so long.

And that they're doing it with no say from the people.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 46 points 1 year ago (13 children)

"If you invite your serial killer gun nut friend to build a tree stand on your property pointed at my house, we're going to have problems"

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago

Some Presidents should stick to declaring only things they have control over.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] StalinForTime@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

Then lastly on Sweden. First of all, it is historic that now Finland is member of the Alliance. And we have to remember the background. The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition for not invade Ukraine. Of course we didn't sign that.

The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign that promise, never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in all Allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe, we should remove NATO from that part of our Alliance, introducing some kind of B, or second class membership. We rejected that.

So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO, close to his borders.

Learn to read.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago

Head of NATO ruzzian shill confirmed

[–] zephyreks@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Then lastly on Sweden. First of all, it is historic that now Finland is member of the Alliance. And we have to remember the background. The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition for not invade Ukraine. Of course we didn't sign that.

The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign that promise, never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in all Allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe, we should remove NATO from that part of our Alliance, introducing some kind of B, or second class membership. We rejected that.

So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO, close to his borders.

At least quote the relevant section ffs

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The closest thing to the lie you wrote is the part where it says Putin demanded that NATO stop recognizing Ukraine as a sovereign country. So he's invading Ukraine because NATO didn't allow him to annex Ukraine Anschluss and annexation of Sudetenland style. And if you think that would help, remember that appeasing Putin over Georgia and, effectively, over Crimea and Donbass didn't do shit to stop his aggression.

Besides the document implies what was already obvious, which is that, before the war, Ukraine wasn't even going to be allowed into NATO any time soon, NATO countries just couldn't sign an agreement that would limit Ukraine's sovereignty.

[–] pindapinda@feddit.nl 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Literally nowhere in these remarks does it say "expansion" or "expansionism"...

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You know synonyms exist right? And "enlargement" and "expansionism" are cleary synonyms in this context.

The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition for not invade Ukraine. Of course we didn't sign that. The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign that promise, never to enlarge NATO.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

But they used Ctrl + F

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ahh yes you have to think a bit critically.

[–] zephyreks@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

You have to read the whole article instead of Ctrl+Fing...

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

Why are they just admitting to it now? What changed?

[–] Serdan@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What he's saying is that Putin doesn't get to dictate which alliances sovereign nations can join.

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ahh yes, NATO, an alliance well known for respecting sovereignty. That's why they invade and bomb any third world nation with a sovereign project against US interests...

And how did these nations join NATO post cold war? Surely there was no manipulation of the sovereignty of Eastern European nations at that time right?

And do NATO countries have sovereignty themselves, or are they just US vassal states? Be honest here, because the answer is quite clear. It's gotten to the point that the US can bomb the gas pipelines of another NATO country (see nordstream) and nothing can be done about it. And every NATO country has to buy US weapons systems, engage in specific international training exercises, etc. Very sovereign.

Let's be clear, realpolitik is all there ever was, and all there ever will be in geopolitics. The "sovereignty" of every nation on the planet is subject to this. Unless you want to do the Turkey/Cuban missile crisis again. There's a reason Mexico can't join BRICS, there's a reason Cuba can't claim Guantanamo bay as theirs, etc.

[–] zephyreks@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sovereign nations like Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, and Cuba, right?

... right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ElGosso@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Serdan@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Except that OP is trying to frame the invasion as justified when the reality is that Putin thought he could bully his neighbors. NATO predictably went "fuck off" and that somehow means bombing Ukrainian children was unavoidable.

[–] zephyreks@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A fair number of bombings have been attributed to defective Ukrainian munitions...

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

And thats not even getting into all the non-defective ones

[–] ElGosso@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't see it like that - I see it like assigning any blame at all to NATO, which it does deserve, to some degree.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition for not invade Ukraine. Of course we didn't sign that."

[–] BitPirate@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago (8 children)

"Don't allow others to join your defense pact or we'll demonstrate why it's necessary in the first place."

Perfectly sane logic. Nothing strange.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

And Ukraine was already invaded…

[–] StalinForTime@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

It's hilarious seeing the liberals' comments here that prove that despite being overeducated they literally don't know how to read.

[–] mephiska@artemis.camp 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Tankies everywhere in this post lol

[–] mrnotoriousman@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For real. They really fucking love Putin too, it's pathetic.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›