this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
185 points (97.4% liked)

PC Gaming

8205 readers
539 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 49 points 8 months ago (8 children)

Duh, people are pissed at corporate greed that’s is at the core of all cease and desist orders on fan projects. Be it from Nintendo, MS, Sony or Valve and they aren’t stopping.

Indie devs need to stop wasting their time and efforts on fan projects that will never be played by the public because of these corporations shutting them down.

Instead of wasting 300+ hours making a fan project with nothing to show but the knowledge and potential lawsuit you’ve gained, how about putting all those hours into a personal project that is inspired by the games you want to copy instead.

You could make the next Portal, Team Fortress 2 or Hit and run. Just name it something different and stop making 1 to 1 reproductions of corporate property.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 43 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Making Portal for the N64 will give you much more exposure and media attention than making just another indie game statistically likely to fail and never get any attention. The guy made a name for himself with this project. Now when he creates an original game, it will get a lot more attention for being made by the Portal 64 developer and have a much better chance to succeed.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Right. Cause we see countless games being advertised as “from the one person that made the hit and run remake”. Or “from the developer of that cancelled Mario project”.

No, the project becomes known for the controversy of being shut down and people forget about it.

We need more indie games and publishing your own indie game is worth way more than popping out another fan wank that’s likely to get you a lawsuit.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You won't see a game advertised as "from that developer who made that thing", rather the dev's employers will see that through their job application.

There's a long history of modders being hired for things. CounterStrike was a mod to Half Life; Valve hired the modders to help make Source. Desert Combat was a mod to BattleField 1942; DICE hired the modders to help make BF2. Any coding project that someone participates in can be used to get a job.

Making indie games is only half the battle. Indie games often don't have the polish that comes from experienced coders - indie games tend to succeed on their ideas, in spite of a lack of technical expertise.

[–] conorab@lemmy.conorab.com 6 points 8 months ago

Back 4 Blood is got a lot of traction initially by saying it was a spiritual successor and made by the same people as Left 4 Dead (1). Of course, nobody plays it anymore because it turned out to be a meh game, but boy did people check it out!

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 4 points 8 months ago

CD Projekt RED also hired some mod developers.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Right. Cause we see countless games being advertised as “from the one person that made the hit and run remake”. Or “from the developer of that cancelled Mario project”.

Maybe not countless, but those absolutely exist. Retro City Rampage? That was originally "Grand Theftendo", a GTA 3 demake for the NES. Some of the AM2R (Metroid 2 remake shut down by Nintendo) developers are currently developing a Metroidvania after a very successful Kickstarter. Guess what the headlines about it focused on? Yup, the fact that they made AM2R.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

It’s also a very good bullet point when interviewing to work for a game studio. Which is something that won’t be in headlines.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Actually we don't really need more indie games. The amount of games released is increasing 14000 games released in 2023 2000 more then 2022. Most of them are not good.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Those indie games are still better and more creative than the last 3 dozen of Ubisofts soulless open world clones.

I would take a gamble on an indie game over any fucking corporate live service scam.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 20 points 8 months ago

Indie devs need to stop wasting their time and efforts on fan projects that will never be played by the public

It's not your time, let them use it how they want. Probably the fun for most is in the development.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Here's the thing, though. Just coding a game is a lot, before worrying about actually designing mechanics and managing meta-progression and writing even a basic story and world building, etc.

Making a fan project is real, concrete experience. It allows you to focus on one specific thing (actually writing the code and managing the codebase) without focusing on all those details. There's a reason most programming courses involve making simplistic clones of stuff that already exists. Many game development classes/tutorials do exactly the same, and work you through a clone of some other, pretty simple game.

That's what a fan project like this is, but it lets you focus on how a game larger in scope manages all the same problems instead of how to do it in brick breaker or whatever. It's valuable experience that's hard to replicate on a smaller project, and it's how some people learn best.

Others absolutely will do better starting small and just iteratively building up forever, but it's not the only way to learn. This approach is legitimate and for many people, better.

Now advertising it? Not a huge point of that. Unless you're actually asking people for feedback (how did they solve this problem?) and learning from example that way, you don't gain anything from telling people about it.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 8 months ago

Now advertising it? Not a huge point of that. Unless you're actually asking people for feedback (how did they solve this problem?) and learning from example that way, you don't gain anything from telling people about it.

You get the motivation to continue; other people are looking forward to your progress and results.

[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

You realize in this case the guy was using proprietary libraries from the N64 without Nintendo's consent in this mod? Valve would be absolutely insane not to dmca that mod. This guy kicked a hornets nest of lawyers by releasing this stuff even if his intentions were to just show the businesses what he can do. He knew what he was doing, he knew what would eventually happen, which is absolutely why he's telling people not to be mad at valve. Valve are just protecting their business in the same way Nintendo is protecting their intellectual property.

[–] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I’ll never forgive those Microsoftian bastards for shutting Halo Online down the very next day after it was released.

[–] infinitepcg@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

It's not greed, companies will literally lose their trademarks if they don't defend them

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why not just make a version of the game that is stripped of IP, then "someone" anonymously releases a conversation mod that adds in the copyrighted content?

But it makes even more sense to just do your own copycat version and actually sell it and make money off it.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

A version of the game stripped of Portal IP would still need to be done using Nintendo's libraries, as the whole point of this project is that it worsk on the Nintendo 64.

You know what gets me? There are retro projects publishing for things like the Commodore 64 that don't see challenges like this.

It makes retro Nintendo hardware just that much more worthless in my view.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nintendo would technically still be able to come after it, but at that point I doubt they'd care.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah what I don't understand is why Valve are defending Nintendo's IP here. They didn't send a cease and desist because it was Portal, they sent it because it uses Nintendo's libraries.

Makes me wonder if there was some kind of legal settlement after the whole Dolphin emulator on Steam thing.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

They're worried that by doing nothing they're implicitly endorsing the project and they don't want to give permission for their IP to infringe on Nintendo's.

[–] flumph@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

Your whole point is undercut by the existence of Portal: Revolution, Portal: Mel, City of Heroes, etc. There's a way to do fan creations that's supported by the IP holders and ways not to do it.

I don't expect indie devs to be experts at the law but they can hardly be surprised if they go outside the boundaries set by the IP holders and then get a C&D.

[–] Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml 45 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Even Valve recognizes Nintendo's ruthlessness.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yup. Remember the Dolphin release? Oh wait

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Dolphin came with the console bios pre-installed tho, that what gave them problem

[–] lukini@beehaw.org 3 points 8 months ago

The issue is the decryption keys, not the bios.

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

I’m gonna guess that the legal team does these things without higher ups hearing of anything until after cease and desists have been made.

load more comments
view more: next ›